Effects of Irrigation Activation Methods on Periapical Healing in Chronic Apical Periodontitis
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Sonic Irrigation Activation: Irrigating solutions were activated using a sonic activation device. The activation tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length, and sonic activation was performed for three 20-second cycles, for a total activation time of 60 seconds.
Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation: Irrigating solutions were activated using a passive ultrasonic irrigation device in endodontic mode. The activation tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length, and ultrasonic activation was performed for three 20-second cycles, for a total activation time of 60 seconds.
Laser-Activated Irrigation: Irrigating solutions were activated using an Er:YAG laser with the following parameters: SSP mode (50 μs), 0.3 W, 15 Hz, and 20 mJ. A radial laser tip was positioned in the coronal pulp chamber, and activation was performed for three 20-second cycles, for a total activation time of 60 seconds.
Study summary
This study aims to evaluate the effects of different irrigation activation methods on periapical healing in teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. Patients underwent root canal treatment using one of three irrigation activation methods: sonic activation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, or laser-activated irrigation. Periapical healing is evaluated by comparing baseline and follow-up periapical radiographs using the Periapical Index (PAI) and fractal analysis. PAI is used to assess changes in periapical status, while fractal dimension analysis is used to quantitatively evaluate changes in the trabecular bone structure in the periapical region. The study aims to determine whether the irrigation activation method used during root canal treatment influences subsequent periapical healing.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Change in Periapical Index (PAI) — Baseline and at least 6 months after root canal treatment
Periapical healing will be assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI) on periapical radiographs. PAI scores range from 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating healthier periapical conditions and higher scores indicating greater severity of periapical pathology. Changes in PAI scores between baseline and follow-up radiographs will be evaluated. - Change in Fractal Dimension (FD) — Baseline and at least 6 months after root canal treatment
Fractal dimension (FD) will be calculated from standardized regions of interest on periapical radiographs using ImageJ software and the box-counting method. Changes in FD values between baseline and follow-up radiographs will be evaluated to quantitatively assess changes in the trabecular bone structure in the periapical region.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Faculty of Dentistry | Rize | Rize Province |
More Recep Tayyip Erdogan University trials in Turkey
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07850895 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey