Comparison of Erythritol Air-Polishing and Conventional Polishing Following Ultrasonic Scaling on the Relapse of Chromogenic Tooth Staining in Children
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Guided Biofilm Therapy with erythritol: Description: Participants assigned to Group 1 will receive professional removal of chromogenic tooth staining using ultrasonic scaling followed by erythritol air-polishing with the EMS air-polishing device, guided by a plaque-disclosing agent. At the end of the procedure, the investigator will record the treatment time, apply the plaque-disclosing agent, obtain intraoral photographs, and assess chromogenic tooth staining using the Qraycam.
Conventional Polishing: Participants will undergo professional tooth cleaning using the ultrasonic scaler of the EMS device. The tooth surfaces will then be polished using a polishing brush and prophylaxis paste.
Study summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effect of erythritol air-polishing and conventional polishing following ultrasonic scaling on the relapse of chromogenic tooth staining in children aged 4-13 years attending the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry for routine dental examination.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Does erythritol air-polishing reduce the relapse of chromogenic tooth staining compared with conventional polishing following ultrasonic scaling?
* Is there a difference in the time to relapse of chromogenic tooth staining between the two polishing techniques?
Researchers will compare conventional polishing (prophylaxis paste and a polishing brush) following ultrasonic scaling with erythritol air-polishing performed using the EMS air-polishing device following ultrasonic scaling to determine whether one method is more effective in preventing or delaying the relapse of chromogenic tooth staining.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Black Stain Score — Baseline, immediately after polishing, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Black Stain Classification (Gasparetto et al., 2003) Score Description Clinical Characteristics 0 None No black pigmentation on the tooth surface. 1. Mild Pigmented dots or thin pigmented lines parallel to the gingival margin that are not continuous. 2. Moderate Continuous pigmented lines o extending over up to one-half of the cervical third of the tooth surface. 3. Severe Pigmentation extending over more than one-half of the cervical third of the tooth surface. Black Stain Classification (Zerman et al., 2024) Score Description A Pigmented lines or dots present only on the buccal surface. B Pigmented lines or dots present on both the buccal and lingual surfaces. C Pigmented lines or dots associated with dental caries. D Recurrent pigmented lines or dots. - Participant Feedback — Periprocedural
Pain perception during the procedure will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "hurts worst." Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity (worse outcome). - Time Session — Periprocedural
The duration of treatment is noted and compared between groups
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marmara Üniversitesi Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Külliyesi Sağlık Yerleşkesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi | Istanbul | MALTEPE |
More Marmara University trials in Turkey
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07730658 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey