Comparison of ESWT and Ultrasound-Guided Ozone Injection in Lateral Epicondylitis
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
ESWT Device: Application of extracorporeal shock waves targeted at the common extensor tendon origin at the lateral epicondyle. The therapeutic procedure is performed once a week for 3 consecutive weeks, totaling 3 sessions. Each session includes 2000 impulses.
ozone injection: Injection of a medical oxygen-ozone gas mixture directly into the common extensor tendon origin at the lateral epicondyle. To ensure precise anatomical localization and safety, the procedure is performed under real-time high-resolution ultrasound guidance and strict sterile conditions. The injection is administered once a week for 3 consecutive weeks, totaling 3 sessions.
Study summary
Lateral epicondylitis is a common and often debilitating condition characterized by pain over the lateral aspect of the elbow. Although many patients respond to standard conservative treatments, a subset develops a chronic and treatment-resistant form of the condition.
The primary objective of this randomized comparative clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effectiveness of two intervention modalities: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound-guided ozone injection in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. The first group will receive Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT), while the second group will receive an ultrasound-guided injection of an ozone-oxygen mixture. Both interventions will be administered once weekly for three consecutive weeks according to their respective standard treatment protocols.
To determine which treatment yields superior clinical and structural outcomes, participants will be evaluated at three time points: baseline (prior to treatment), immediately after completion of the 3-week treatment protocol, and at a 4-week follow-up. Outcome measures will include pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional status evaluated with the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), hand grip strength measured with a dynamometer, and structural tendon changes (tendon thickness and presence of enthesophytes) assessed by high-resolution ultrasonography.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) — Baseline, immediately after treatment completion, and 4 weeks after treatment completion.
Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst possible pain. - Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) — Baseline, immediately after treatment completion, and 4 weeks after treatment completion.
Functional disability was assessed using the PRTEE questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (significant functional disability).
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ankara Bilkent City Hospital | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) | Recruiting |
More Ankara City Hospital Bilkent trials in Turkey
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07427368 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey