To Assess Safety and Efficacy of Agents Targeting DNA Damage Repair With Olaparib Versus Olaparib Monotherapy.
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Olaparib Continuous (28-Day cycle) 300 mg BD.: Two (2) 150 mg olaparib tablets should be taken at the same time each day, approximately 12 hours apart with one glass of water (approximately 250 mL).
Ceralasertib 160 mg OD + olaparib continuous 300 mg BD (28-day cycle).: Patients will be administered Ceralasertib OD at 160 mg from Day 1 to Day 7 (inclusive) of every 28-day cycle.
Adavosertib 150 mg BD + olaparib 200 mg BD (21-day cycle).: Patients will be administered adavosertib BD at 150mg from Day 1 to Day 3 and Day 8 to Day 10.
Study summary
This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy versus olaparib in combination with an inhibitor of ATR (Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related protein kinase (Ceralasertib \[AZD6738\]) and olaparib monotherapy versus olaparib in combination with an inhibitor of WEE1 (adavosertib \[AZD1775\]) in second or third line setting in patients with Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prospectively stratified by presence/absence of qualifying tumour mutation in genes involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Treatment arms are olaparib monotherapy, olaparib+ Ceralasertib and olaparib+adavosertib. The study subject population will be divided into Stratum A, Stratum B, and Stratum C. Due to the different schedules of administration of each of the treatment options as well as their different toxicity profiles, the study is not blinded. Study has two stage consent process- stage 1 consent (molecular screening for HRR defects) and stage 2 consent (main study). Patients with TNBC and with known qualifying BRCAm, non BRCAm HRRm and non HRRm status will be offered the option of consenting to the main part of the study within the 28-day screening period. Following the ISRC meeting on 17 April 2019 a recommendation was made to close the adavosertib+olaparib treatment arm across all biomarker strata. Patients receiving treatment with adavosertib+olaparib treatment were offered the opportunity to continue treatment on olaparib monotherapy at the approved dose (300 mg bd). Following the closure of this arm the total number of patients randomised will be lower (approximately 350 patients). Approximately 300 patients will be randomised (using randomisation ratio 1:1) to 2 ongoing treatment arms plus an additional 47 patients to a 3rd arm (olaparib+adavosertib) prior to the arm being discontinued.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Progression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR) — Until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)
Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by Blinded independent central review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours Version (RECIST 1.1). Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: Breast cancer susceptible gene mutation (BRCAm) patients; non BRCAm homologous recombination repair gene mutation (HRRm) patients; non HRRm patients. - Progression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis) — Until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)
Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by the site Investigator. Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST 1.1 assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.
Trial sites (141)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Birmingham | Alabama | |
| Research Site | Anchorage | Alaska | |
| Research Site | Gilbert | Arizona | |
| Research Site | Aurora | Colorado | |
| Research Site | New Haven | Connecticut | |
| Research Site | Chicago | Illinois | |
| Research Site | Munster | Indiana | |
| Research Site | Hazard | Kentucky | |
| Research Site | Louisville | Kentucky | |
| Research Site | Towson | Maryland | |
| Research Site | Brick | New Jersey | |
| Research Site | East Setauket | New York | |
| Research Site | Lake Success | New York | |
| Research Site | Mineola | New York | |
| Research Site | Mount Kisco | New York | |
| Research Site | Stony Brook | New York | |
| Research Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | |
| Research Site | Knoxville | Tennessee | |
| Research Site | Seattle | Washington | |
| Research Site | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | |
| Research Site | Brasschaat | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Brussels | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Brussels | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Charleroi | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Leuven | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Liège | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Namur | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Ottignies | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Wilrijk | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Calgary | Alberta | |
| Research Site | Kelowna | British Columbia | |
| Research Site | Ottawa | Ontario | |
| Research Site | Toronto | Ontario | |
| Research Site | Brno | Czechia | |
| Research Site | Olomouc | Czechia | |
| Research Site | Prague | Czechia | |
| Research Site | Angers | France | |
| Research Site | Besançon | France | |
| Research Site | Bordeaux | France | |
| Research Site | Caen | France |
+ 101 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.
More AstraZeneca trials in Italy
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT03330847 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Italy