Osseodensification: Osseodensification uses specially designed burs to densify osteotomy site
Underdrilling: In underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed
Study summary
This clinical trial aims to compare two drilling protocols Underdrilling and Osseodensification for placing dental implants in patients with low bone density. The purpose is to compare which technique provides better primary and secondary implant stability in the posterior regions of the jaw with low bone density. The hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in implant stability between the two protocols.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patient partially edentulous ridge after extraction of more than 6 months and with low bone density.
2. Systemically healthy patients ≥18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Smokers.
2. Pregnant or lactating females.
3. Uncontrolled systemic disease like diabetes, hypertension, hormonal therapy and hematologic diseases.
4. History of Maxillary sinus pathology.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Implant stability — 12-18 months It compares Primary stability and Secondary stability after implant placement. Primary stability is recorded by insertion torque values from manual torque wrench. Secondary stability is recorded by resonance frequency analysis.
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
PGIDS
Rohtak
Haryana
More Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak trials in India
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.