Comparative Study Between Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) And Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Block for Positioning Analgesia Prior to Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Patients
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
PENG Block: Pericapsular Nerve Group Block
LCFN block: Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve block
bupivacaine 0.25%.: 0.25% of Bupivacaine (Bupivacaine 0.5% is added to Lidocaine 2% in the same volume)
Xylocaine 2 %: local infilteration at the insertion site
Study summary
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block alone versus the PENG block combined with the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) block in providing adequate analgesia for patient positioning during spinal anesthesia in individuals undergoing surgery for hip fracture.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- To compare the time taken to achieve optimal positioning for spinal anesthesia in both groups — from initiation of patient positioning until optimal positioning is achieved during the spinal anesthesia procedure
time taken in seconds for positioning for spinal anesthesia 15 minutes post- block
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Egypt | Recruiting |
More Ain Shams University trials in Egypt
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07687290 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt