Ireland
--:--IST
Recruiting Not applicable

Comparison of Demineralized and Mineralized Dentin Grafts in Ridge Preservation

NCT07242313 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Egypt tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2025-10-21
Last updated
2025-11-24

Condition(s) studied

Alveolar Ridge PreservationPost Extraction Alveolar Bone Resorption

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Demineralized Allogeneic Dentin GraftMineralized Allogeneic Dentin Graft

Demineralized Allogeneic Dentin Graft: Particulate demineralized allogeneic dentin processed from donor teeth using standardized laboratory protocols, including cleaning, defatting, demineralization, dehydration, freeze-drying, and sterilization. The graft is placed into the extraction socket following atraumatic extraction, covered with a resorbable collagen dressing, and the site is closed to promote alveolar ridge preservation.

Mineralized Allogeneic Dentin Graft: Particulate mineralized allogeneic dentin derived from processed donor teeth. The dentin is cleaned, defatted, ultrasonically treated, dehydrated, freeze-dried, and sterilized while retaining its mineral phase. The graft is inserted into the extraction socket after atraumatic extraction and covered with a resorbable collagen material prior to closure to support ridge preservation.

Study summary

This clinical investigation aims to assess how two different allogeneic dentin graft materials - one de-mineralized and the other mineralized - influence bone preservation following extraction of a single upper posterior tooth. A total of 45 patients will be randomly allocated into three equal groups: a socket-only spontaneous healing group (control), a de-mineralized dentin graft group, and a mineralized dentin graft group. Over a six-month period after extraction, measurements will be taken using CBCT to monitor changes in ridge width, height, and bone density. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported pain, postoperative swelling, satisfaction levels, width of keratinized tissue, and histomorphometric data from biopsy samples at implant placement. Findings from this trial may support evidence-based decisions in alveolar ridge preservation and help clinicians choose the most predictable grafting strategy before implant placement.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: Adults aged 18 to 60 years. Medically healthy patients classified as ASA I. Presence of a single non-restorable tooth indicated for extraction in the posterior maxilla. Adequate oral hygiene, with plaque and bleeding indices both below 20%. Sufficient bone volume to allow socket preservation without requiring simultaneous augmentation. Patients willing to participate in the study and able to provide written informed consent. Ability to commit to follow-up visits for up to 6 months. Exclusion Criteria: Smokers or tobacco users of any form. Presence of uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes). Conditions affecting bone metabolism (e.g., osteoporosis, long-term corticosteroid therapy). Pregnant or lactating women. History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region. Active infection or suppuration at the extraction site. Immunocompromised patients or those on immunosuppressive therapy. Patients taking medications known to impair healing (e.g., bisphosphonates). Allergy or hypersensitivity to any study-related materials.

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • Change in Alveolar Ridge Width (Buccolingual Dimension) — Baseline (immediately after extraction) and 6 months post-operative
    Measurement of the buccolingual width of the alveolar ridge using standardized Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Width is measured at predetermined reference points to assess dimensional bone changes following grafting.
  • Change in Alveolar Ridge Height (Vertical Dimension) — Baseline and 6 months post-operative
    Vertical height of the alveolar ridge measured radiographically on CBCT at standardized anatomical landmarks to quantify bone height changes over the healing period.
  • Bone Density at the Grafted Site — 6 months post-operative
    Bone density at the extraction site measured using CBCT expressed in Hounsfield Units (HU) to evaluate bone quality gained after grafting

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University Kafr ash Shaykh Egypt Recruiting
Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07242313 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt