Comparison of Physiological Effects of Two Types of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy in Tracheostomized Patients
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Modified high flow tracheal oxygen: Modified high-flow tracheal oxygen with flow rates of 40L/min and 60L/min will be performed.
Standard high flow tracheal oxygen: Standard high-flow tracheal oxygen with flow rates of 40 L/min and 60 L/min will be performed.
Study summary
High-flow nasal oxygen therapy offers benefits like precise oxygen delivery, flow-related positive end-expiratory pressure generation and improved lung function. High-flow oxygen therapy can be applied via tracheostomy as high-flow tracheal oxygen. While high-flow tracheal oxygen has been used to facilitate weaning, it has diminished physiological effects due to bypassing upper airways. To enhance its effectiveness, researchers developed a modified high-flow tracheal oxygen tube with a smaller expiratory end diameter to increase airway resistance and pressure. This is a prospective randomized crossover study that aims to compare the physiological effects of standard and modified high-flow oxygen therapy in tracheostomized patients.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Mean expiratory airway pressure — From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours
Mean expiratory airway pressure will be measured during standard and modified high-flow tracheal oxygen. - Positive end-expiratory pressure — From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours
Positive end-expiratory pressure will be measured during standard and modified high-flow tracheal oxygen. - Change of end-expiatory lung volume — From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours
Change of end-expiatory lung volume will be measured during standard and modified high-flow tracheal oxygen.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Shijitan Hospital | Beijing | Beijing Municipality |
More Jian-Xin Zhou trials in China
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06816745 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in China