Clinical Trials in Turkey / NCT07673952
Active, not recruiting
Not applicable
Effect on Placement Tecnique of Bulkfill Composite
NCT07673952 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Turkey tracker
Condition(s) studied
Dental CariesDental Restoration Failure
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
bulk tecniqueincrementally technique
bulk tecnique: The bulkfill resin composite was placed bulk tecnique and light cured with the same LED for 20 s by the same operator.
incrementally technique: The bulkfill resin composite was placed incrementally (2mm) and light cured with the same LED for 20 s by the same operator.
Study summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a bulk-fill composite resin (3M ESPE Filtek Bulk Fill, St Paul, MN, USA) in restorations placed in occlusal cavities by comparing different placement techniques (bulk vs. incremental) using modified USPHS criteria.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:Good general health, 18 years of age or older, Acceptable oral hygiene level, Present at least 20 teeth in the occlusion, Have at least two or four posterior teeth in need of restorative treatment. Have carious lesions, defective restorations replacement due to esthetic reasons).
Exclusion Criteria:Poor oral hygiene, Having possible allergy to resin-based restorations, Advanced periodontal disease, Xerostomia, Pregnancy or breastfeeding, Severe systemic disease, Diagnosis of bruxism, Bleaching treatment or orthodontic treatment.
\-
Primary outcome measure(s)
- RETENTİON — From baseline to 6 year the change of restorations was evaluated
The retention criterion determines how long a restorative material functions in the oral environment, it is the most important criterion that shows the success of the material. Alpha: The restoration is present. Charlie: The restoration is absent. - Marginal Discoloration — From baseline to 6 year the change of restorations was evaluated
The marginal discoloration that occur at the edge staining restoration boundaries are generally thought to be due to microleakage. Alpha: No discoloration at margins. Bravo: Shallow discoloration, clinically acceptable. Charlie: Deep discoloration clinically unacceptable. - Marginal Adaptation — From baseline to 6 year the change of restorations was evaluated
Marginal adaptation is achieved by fully ensuring the integrity of the tooth-restoration joint border. Alpha: Restoration is closely adapted to the tooth. Bravo: Visible evidence of a crevice along the margin, dentin not exposed, clinically acceptable. Charlie: Explorer penetrates into crevice, dentin is exposed; clinically unacceptable. - Color match — From baseline to 2 year the change of restorations was evaluated
Color match is the evaluation of the restoration according to the darkening or lightening of the color, taking into account the tooth tissue surrounding restoration. Alpha:Matches tooth. Bravo: Acceptable mismatch. Charlie:Unacceptable mismatch. - Post-op Hypersensitivity — From baseline to 6 year the change of restorations was evaluated
Determination of sensitivity after restorations are placed. Alpha: Absent. Charlie: Present; clinically unacceptable. - Secondary caries — From baseline to 6 year the change of restorations was evaluated
Secondary caries is the progression of caries in the tooth tissue adjacent to the restorations. Caries formation means restoration failure. Alpha: Absent. Charlie: Present; clinically unacceptable.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
More Hacettepe University trials in Turkey
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Bulk-fill Composite Resin
Active, not recruiting
Other trials for the same condition
Official registry record
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07673952 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey