Assess Accuracy of Primary Care Asthma and COPD Diagnosis Using Oscillometry and FeNO vs Specialist Diagnosis
Condition(s) studied
Study summary
Current diagnostic methods for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mostly depend on pulmonary function tests, especially spirometry. While spirometry is a foundational tool, its diagnostic accuracy is often limited by the patient's ability to perform forceful breathing maneuvers, as well as technical and reproducibility challenges, and the need for proper equipment and training. These constraints can compromise effective diagnosis of asthma and COPD in primary care settings. Prompt and accurate diagnosis by primary care physicians is essential for better patient outcomes. Although variable airflow limitation often measured as a change in FEV1 after bronchodilator is a hallmark of asthma, inconsistencies in test quality and reversibility criteria create challenges in distinguishing asthma from COPD. These complexities highlight the need for alternative diagnostic tools beyond traditional spirometry.
This observational study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and technical feasibility of using oscillometry and FeNO testing in primary care for suspected asthma and COPD, compared to conventional specialist-based diagnostics. The study will be conducted across 7 countries in the MEA, Asia, and Latin America, with two hospital sites per country. Primary care physicians will be trained in oscillometry and FeNO testing using standardized protocols and tools such as the Ambulatory Lung Diagnosis System following GINA and GOLD guidelines. Eligible patients will provide consent, complete a history and symptom questionnaire, and undergo primary care-based assessment for a provisional diagnosis. If specialist assessment cannot occur the same day, it will be done within three days. No follow-up visits are planned. Study outcomes will inform the feasibility and accuracy of integrating these methods into routine care, aiming to improve the early and reliable diagnosis of asthma and COPD.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Accuracy of primary care asthma/COPD diagnosis using oscillometry (ALDS: R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, Ax) plus FeNO ≥50 ppb (Fenom PRO®/ALDS Pro) vs specialist gold standard; metrics: Cohen's kappa, agreement, sensitivity, specificity in overall, asthma, COPD — 1 to 3 days
Primary care diagnosis uses a diagnostic algorithm combining oscillometry and FeNO. Oscillometry: Ambulatory Lung Diagnosis System (ALDS) parameters-respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5), resistance at 20 Hz (R20), difference R5-R20, reactance at 5 Hz (X5), and area of reactance (Ax). FeNO: measured with Fenom PRO® or ALDS Pro devices, using a diagnostic cut-off of ≥50 ppb. Specialist care diagnosis is the comparator: Gold Standard Specialist Care Diagnosis established through standard clinical practice, including pulmonary function tests, spirometry, physiological tests, imaging, laboratory tests, and bronchial provocation tests. Accuracy will be quantified using Cohen's Kappa coefficient, Percentage Agreement, Sensitivity, and Specificity. The analysis will be conducted in the overall population, the asthma group, and the COPD group.
Trial sites (12)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Buenos Aires | Argentina | Recruiting |
| Research Site | Medoza | Argentina | Recruiting |
| Research Site | Alexandria | Egypt | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | El Waili | Egypt | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Monterrey | Mexico | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Santiago de Quer Taro | Mexico | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Riyadh | Saudi Arabia | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Taichung | Taiwan | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Taoyuan City | Taiwan | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Dubai | United Arab Emirates | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Hanoi | Vietnam | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Research Site | Ho Chi Minh City | Vietnam | Recruiting |
More AstraZeneca trials in Taiwan
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07245576 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Taiwan