Ireland
--:--IST
Latest
Astellas Expands Its 330 Million Euro Tralee Biopharma Facility with a Second Aseptic Filling Line to Double Drug-Product Capacity Xeolas Pharmaceuticals Opens 158,000 Sq Ft State-of-the-Art Baldoyle Facility to Scale Specialty Medicine Manufacturing Priya Life Science Partners with Fleming for the 9th Annual Corporate Compliance & Transparency in Life Sciences Summit in Zurich Ireland Has the Capital and the Lessons: Digital Project Management Is How They Become Delivery Dunbar Pharma Brings First Plant-Derived Dronabinol API to UK Market Through IPS Pharma Leveraging Priya Life Science as a Data Tracker: The Ultimate Use Case & Career Guide The €100K Reality Check: Why a Six-Figure Pharma Salary in Ireland Feels Different Than in Switzerland or Germany Ireland's €93.8 Billion Non-EU Pharma Export Engine: Trade Data, Destination Markets, and Economic Impact Astellas Expands Its 330 Million Euro Tralee Biopharma Facility with a Second Aseptic Filling Line to Double Drug-Product Capacity Xeolas Pharmaceuticals Opens 158,000 Sq Ft State-of-the-Art Baldoyle Facility to Scale Specialty Medicine Manufacturing Priya Life Science Partners with Fleming for the 9th Annual Corporate Compliance & Transparency in Life Sciences Summit in Zurich Ireland Has the Capital and the Lessons: Digital Project Management Is How They Become Delivery Dunbar Pharma Brings First Plant-Derived Dronabinol API to UK Market Through IPS Pharma Leveraging Priya Life Science as a Data Tracker: The Ultimate Use Case & Career Guide The €100K Reality Check: Why a Six-Figure Pharma Salary in Ireland Feels Different Than in Switzerland or Germany Ireland's €93.8 Billion Non-EU Pharma Export Engine: Trade Data, Destination Markets, and Economic Impact
Recruiting Not applicable

Safety and Performance Study of the Optimum Transcatheter Aortic Valve

NCT04076150 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Poland tracker
Sponsor
Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Inc
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2022-05-18
Last updated
2022-09-21

Condition(s) studied

Severe Aortic Stenosis

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) Implantation With The Optimum TAV System

Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) Implantation With The Optimum TAV System: Treating patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis via transcatheter aortic valve implantation by implanting the Optimum TAV inside the native diseased valve via a the Precision Catheter. The Optimum TAV and Precision Catheter together are the Optimum TAV System.

Study summary

The TAVI (Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Inc.) -1 Study: Safety and Performance Study of the Optimum Transcatheter Aortic Valve- First-in-human study to assess feasibility and safety of the Optimum Aortic Valve Implant

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
70 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Willing and capable to provide informed consent; 2. 70 years of age or older; 3. Echocardiographic or hemodynamic based evidence of calcific (senile) aortic stenosis with one of the following: aortic valve Effective Orifice Area (EAO) ≤ 1.0 cm2 or 0.6 cm2/m2, mean aortic valve gradient ≥35 mmHg or peak aortic valve velocity \> 4 m/sec. 4. Symptomatology due to native aortic stenosis resulting in a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of II or greater. 5. Aortic valve annular diameter ≥ 21 and ≤ 23mm measured by MSCT (Multi-Slice Computed Tomography). 6. A STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) score ≥ 8; or Logistic EuroScore I ≥ 15; or a determination by the local heart team that the co-morbidities not captured by the STS or EuroScore are expected to increase the operative mortality risk to \> 15%. 7. Geographically available and willing to comply with follow up. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve; 2. Noncalcified aortic valve; 3. Valve eccentricity (calcific or otherwise) that in the opinion of the investigator could compromise procedural success; 4. Severe (Grade 3 to 4) aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve regurgitation; 5. Moderate to severe mitral stenosis; 6. Myocardial infarction within the past 30 days\* 7. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation; 8. LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) \< 30%; 9. Severe pulmonary hypertension with pulmonary systolic pressure greater than two-thirds of systemic pressure; 10. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic drug therapy within the past 14 days or mechanical support within the past 6 months; \* 11. Presence of significant aortic disease such as atheroma, thrombus, or aneurysm which, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes safe implant delivery; 12. Blood dyscrasias defined as: acute leukopenia, acute anemia, acute thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy; 13. Patient ineligible for or refuses blood transfusions; 14. Unfavorable peripheral vascular anatomy or disease (e.g. severe obstructive calcification, severe tortuosity or small vessels) that would preclude passage of catheters from the femoral arterial access to the aorta as evidenced by peripheral MSCT; 15. Gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 30 days; \* 16. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within past 3 months;\* 17. Renal insufficiency as demonstrated by a serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL; 18. End stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis; 19. Active infection requiring ongoing treatment; 20. Need for emergent surgery or intervention other than the investigational procedure; 21. Hypersensitivity or contraindication to procedural medication(s) and device material(s) (e.g. titanium, nickel, pork) which cannot be adequately pre-medicated; 22. Life expectancy \< 1 year due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions; 23. Currently participating in any other investigational drug or device study; 24. Patient lacking capacity to provide informed consent (history of any cognitive or mental health status that would interfere with study participation) 25. Subject found to have an International Normalized Ratio (INR) greater than 2.0 right before the procedure. * At the time of procedure, if a subject's medical status has changed since enrollment, the subject shall be re-evaluated for eligibility.

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • Device Success — 30 days
    Valve deployed from delivery system successfully
  • Correct Positioning — 30 days
    Deploying a single Optimum TAV in the intended anatomical position and confirming via fluoroscopy as determined by the implanting physician
  • Intended Performance of Optimum TAV - Leaflet Function — 30 days
    Evaluate leaflet function by assessing the effective orifice area (EOA) (units: cm\^2) via echocardiography
  • Intended Performance of Optimum TAV - mean aortic valve gradient — 30 days
    Evaluate hemodynamics by assessing the mean aortic valve gradient (units: mmHg) via echocardiography
  • Intended Performance of Optimum TAV - peak aortic valve velocity — 30 days
    Evaluate hemodynamics by assessing the peak aortic valve velocity (units: m/s) via echocardiography
  • Intended Performance of Optimum TAV - Paravalvular Leak — 30 days
    Evaluate proper valve sealing by assessing paravalvular leak via echocardiography and fluoroscopy. If paravalvular leak is determined, it will be classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
John Paul II Hospital, Dept. of Interventional Cardiology Krakow Poland Recruiting
Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT04076150 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Poland