A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Fecal Transplant and Dietary Changes on Disease Activity in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis on Advanced Therapies

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Fecal Microbial Transplantation: This will involve colonoscopic instillation of fecal transplant

Anti-Inflammatory Diet: The modified diet plan will be given to each study participant

Sham transplantation: Sham FMT will involve saline infusion via colonoscopy

Sham Diet: Dietary counselling alone

Advanced Therapy: Advanced therapy as standard dose and schedule

Study summary

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon characterized by superficial mucosal inflammation. Treatment aims to achieve and maintain remission, improve quality of life, and minimize complications. Advanced therapies, including biologics and small molecules, have significantly improved UC management by targeting specific inflammatory pathways. However, due to the multifactorial nature of UC-driven by genetic, environmental, and microbial factors-many patients do not achieve sustained remission, highlighting a therapeutic ceiling. Gut microbial dysbiosis and immune dysregulation are central to UC pathogenesis, with diet playing a critical role in influencing the gut microbiome. While biologics and small molecules have limitations, innovative approaches like combining fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and dietary interventions with advanced therapies show promise. FMT restores microbial balance, modulates immunity, and reduces inflammation, while dietary modifications, such as anti-inflammatory diets, enhance FMT efficacy by creating a favorable environment for donor microbiota engraftment. The present study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of three different microbiome manipulation strategies- FMT, AID and FMT + AID in combination with advanced therapies in patients with active UC in a 2X2 factorial trial design. Patients would be randomized into four different arms: FMT, AID, FMT+AID and placebo. The advanced therapies (biologics or small molecules) would be given in all four arms as standard therapy. With this design the trial would answer two important questions: a) efficacy of combination treatment with advanced therapies and microbiome manipulation strategies in active UC, and b) comparative efficacy of different microbiome manipulation strategies.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response at 10 weeks — 10 weeks
  Proportion of patients having- 1. Clinical remission which is defined as the Modified Mayo Score (mMS) \< 2 \\ mMS- Full Title: Modified Mayo Score Range: 0 to 12 Higher Scores = Worse Outcome (A score of 0 represents no disease activity, and a score of 12 represents the most severe disease activity.) 2. Endoscopic response which is defined as Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) by 1 point MES- Full Title: Mayo Endoscopic Score Range: 0 to 4 Higher Scores = Worse Outcome (A score of 0 represents normal endoscopic findings, and a score of 4 represents severe mucosal damage.
• Proportion of patients having clinical remission and endoscopic remission at week 48 — 48 weeks
  Proportion of patients having- 1. Clinical remission which is defined as the Modified Mayo Score (mMS) \< 2 mMS- Full Title: Modified Mayo Score Range: 0 to 12 Higher Scores = Worse Outcome (A score of 0 represents no disease activity, and a score of 12 represents the most severe disease activity.) 2. Endoscopic response which is defined as Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) by 1 point MES- Full Title: Mayo Endoscopic Score Range: 0 to 4 Higher Scores = Worse Outcome (A score of 0 represents normal endoscopic findings, and a score of 4 represents severe mucosal damage.

Trial sites (6)

More All India Institute of Medical Sciences trials in India

Other trials for the same condition