NeVa Retrospective Comparative SR Study
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Mechanical thrombectomy: Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever
Study summary
To compare safety and effectiveness of NeVa Stent Retriever (SR) to Control SR in the treatment of stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. The main questions it aims to answer are:
How do recanalization rates for NeVa SR compare with those of the Control SR? How does NeVa SR safety compare with Control SR safety?
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Reperfusion Effectiveness — Procedural
Number of patients with a Modified Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥2B and mTICI≥2C recanalization after 1st pass and at end of procedure
Trial sites (5)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Espanol de Mendoza | Mendoza | Argentina | |
| CHU LIege | Liège | Belgium | |
| UK Munster | Münster | Germany | |
| Republican Vilnius University Hospital | Vilnius | Lithuania | |
| İstanbul Aydrn Üniversitesi | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06964724 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Germany