Ireland
--:--IST
Active, not recruiting Not applicable

Comparison of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus no Axillary Surgery

NCT02466737 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Germany tracker
Sponsor
University of Rostock
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2015-09
Last updated
2026-05-01

Condition(s) studied

Breast Cancer

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

no axillary surgery versus SLNBSLNB versus completion ALND

no axillary surgery versus SLNB: in cases with newly diagnosed breast cancer and clinically negative axillary status

SLNB versus completion ALND: in cases with 1-3 macrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes

Study summary

Although there is no doubt that the presence of lymph node metastases worsens prognosis of a patient, unambiguous evidence to support lymph node dissection is still lacking. For many solid tumors, the role of lymph node dissection is yet controversial, and may depend on the tumor type and the stage of patient presentation for diagnosis. Axillary surgery for breast cancer is now considered as staging procedure that does not seem to influence breast cancer mortality. Women with breast cancer have benefitted greatly from a series of carefully performed randomized controlled trial focusing on axillary surgery. The objective of INSEMA is to show that less axillary surgery is better, in that oncological outcomes are the same and less surgical intervention will result in fewer surgical complications.

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Written informed consent prior to beginning breast-conserving surgery, including expected cooperation of the patients for follow-up, must be obtained and documented according to the local regulatory requirements * Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast (core biopsy or open biopsy). Multifocal or multicentric tumors are allowed if breast-conserving surgery is planned * Age at diagnosis at least 18 years * Preoperative imaging techniques with estimated tumor size of \<5 cm (iT1/iT2 irrespective of hormone sensitivity or HER2 status) * Clinically and sonographically tumor-free axilla prior to core biopsy (cN0/iN0) * In cases with cN0 and iN+, a negative core biopsy or fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the sonographically suspected lymph node is required before randomization * No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (M0) * Planned breast-conserving surgery (R0 resection) with postoperative external whole-breast irradiation (conventional fractionation or hypofractionation) Exclusion Criteria: * History of malignancy within last 5 years, except curatively treated basalioma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Time since core biopsy \>3 months (optimal \<1 month) * Previous and already (neoadjuvant) treated invasive breast carcinoma * Histologically non-invasive breast carcinoma * cT3/T4 or iT3/T4 tumors * pregnant or lactating patients * Planned total mastectomy (e.g. multicentric tumors ) * Planned intraoperative radiotherapy (e.g. Intrabeam) or postoperative partial breast irradiation (e.g. multicatheter technique) alone; both procedures are allowed as boost techniques * Male patients

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) after breast-conserving surgery — 5 years
    non-inferiority question

Trial sites (150)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Universitätsfrauenklinik Salzburg Salzburg State of Salzburg
BGZ Dornbirn, Gynäkologie Dornbirn Austria
LKH Uni-Klinikum Graz, Gynäkologie Graz Austria
Ordensklinikum-BHS Linz Austria
Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz Austria
KH der Barmherzigen Brüder Saint Veit/Glan Austria
Hanusch-Krankenhaus, Brustzentrum Vienna Austria
Landes-Krankenhaus Wolfsberg, Chirurgie Wolfsberg Austria
Ostalb-Klinikum, Brustzentrum Aalen Aalen Baden-Wurttemberg
Caritas-Krankenhaus Brustzentrum Tauberfranken Bad Mergentheim Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum Mittelbach Brustzentrum Baden-Baden Baden-Wurttemberg
Sana-Klinikum Biberach Biberach Baden-Wurttemberg
Krankenhaus Bietigheim Bietigheim Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum Böblingen Böblingen Baden-Wurttemberg
Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal Baden-Wurttemberg
Brustzentrum Donau-Riß Ehingen Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum Esslingen Esslingen am Neckar Baden-Wurttemberg
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Freiburg im Breisgau Baden-Wurttemberg
Frauenklinik Freudenstadt Freudenstadt Baden-Wurttemberg
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg Baden-Wurttemberg
Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Baden-Wurttemberg
ViDia Christliche Kliniken, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Baden-Wurttemberg
St. Elisabethen Krankenhaus Loerrach Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum Ludwigsburg Ludwigsburg Baden-Wurttemberg
Helios Klinik Pforzheim Pforzheim Baden-Wurttemberg
Siloah St. Trudpert Klinikum Pforzheim Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum am Steinenberg Reutlingen Baden-Wurttemberg
Helios Klinik Rottweil Rottweil Baden-Wurttemberg
Rems-Murr Klinik Schorndorf Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum Tuttlingen Tuttlingen Baden-Wurttemberg
Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen Baden-Wurttemberg
Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm Ulm Baden-Wurttemberg
Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen Baden-Wurttemberg
Rems-Murr Kliniken Winnenden Baden-Wurttemberg
Klinikum St. Marien Amberg Bavaria
AN regiomed Klinikum Ansbach Ansbach Bavaria
Klinikum Aschaffenburg Aschaffenburg Bavaria
Hämatologisch-onkologische Praxis Augsburg Bavaria
Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Frauenklinik Bayreuth Bavaria
Kreisklinik Ebersberg Ebersberg Bavaria

+ 110 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT02466737 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Germany