Ireland
--:--IST
Recruiting Phase 3

Effect at 3 Months of Early Empagliflozin Initiation in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on Mortality, Rehospitalization, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Renal Function.

NCT05879276 · tracked via the Priya Life Science France tracker
Phase
Phase 3
Started
2024-12-16
Last updated
2025-06-27

Condition(s) studied

Cardiogenic Shock

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Empagliflozin 10 MG →

Empagliflozin 10 MG: Patients in cardiogenic shock receiving empagliflozin in addition to standard management at a dose of 10 mg per day per os (or through nasogastric tube in intubated patients) for a duration of 12 weeks.

Study summary

Long term prognosis of cardiogenic shock is related to the resolution of haemodynamic failure, associated visceral failure and the recovery of an adequate myocardial function. In the immediate aftermath of cardiogenic shock, after catecholamines weaning, there are no recommendations on cardiovascular treatments that would improve this long term prognosis. Indeed, the standard cardiovascular treatments such as inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin and aldosterone system and beta-blockers have hypotensive and negative inotropic effects and may worsen the renal function. In practice, given their side effects, they are not prescribed in the immediate aftermath of cardiogenic shock.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (iSGLT2) inhibitors are now an integral part of the drug management of chronic heart failure and the EMPULSE-HF trial has just demonstrated a benefit in acute heart failure (PMID: 35228754). Several pivotal clinical trials have demonstrated a significant effect of iSGLT2 on the survival and the risk of re hospitalisation for heart failure (PMID: 32865377, 31535829, 33200892). Our hypothesis is that, in patients in cardiogenic shock, early treatment with Empaglifozin in addition to the standard management could reduce mortality and morbidity (death, transplantation/LVAD and rehospitalisation for heart failure) and improve myocardial function at 12 weeks, compared with standard management alone.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients hospitalized in critical cardiac unit care or Intensive care unit for a cardiogenic shock * "Who must have been or is on catecholamines for at least 12 hours for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. * Patients who are able to take oral tablets Exclusion Criteria: * GFR\< 20 ml/min/1.73m2. * Chronic dialysis. * Patient on SGLT2 inhibitors prior to admission to ICU or CCU. * Known allergy to SGLT2 inhibitors or to any of its excipients (in particular, patients with hereditary disorders of galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose or galactose malabsorption syndrome) * Patients on lithium. * Patient in shock for another cause or moribund (SAPS2\> 90). * Specific cardiogenic shock context: 1. cardiac transplant patient or on transplant list. 2. peripartum, adrenergic, valvular, non ischemic, post embolic heart disease. 3. related to cardiotropic drug intoxication. 4. Secondary to a cardiac arrest for which the patient remains comatose prior to inclusion. * Women of childbearing age without effective contraception. * Person referred to in Articles 10, 31, 32, 33 and 34 of EU Regulation 536/2014 (Pregnant woman, parturient or breastfeeding mother, Minor (not emancipated), Adult person subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice))

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • Time to all-cause death — 12-week after randomisation
    To compare the effect of early introduction of empagliflozin in addition to standard management versus standard management alone on composite endpoint components: 1. All-cause mortality or heart transplantation or ventricular assist, 2. Rehospitalization for heart failure, 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction. Hierarchical composite endpoint, assessed at 12 weeks from randomization (win-ratio method): * Rank 1: Time to all-cause death or cardiac transplantation or mechanical ventricular assist, * Rank 2: Time to rehospitalization for heart failure, * Rank 3: Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed during a research cardiac ultrasound.
  • Time to cardiac transplantation — 12-week after randomisation
    To compare the effect of early introduction of empagliflozin in addition to standard management versus standard management alone on composite endpoint components: 1. All-cause mortality or heart transplantation or ventricular assist, 2. Rehospitalization for heart failure, 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction. Hierarchical composite endpoint, assessed at 12 weeks from randomization (win-ratio method): * Rank 1: Time to all-cause death or cardiac transplantation or mechanical ventricular assist, * Rank 2: Time to rehospitalization for heart failure, * Rank 3: Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed during a research cardiac ultrasound.
  • Time to mechanical ventricular assist — 12-week after randomisation
    To compare the effect of early introduction of empagliflozin in addition to standard management versus standard management alone on composite endpoint components: 1. All-cause mortality or heart transplantation or ventricular assist, 2. Rehospitalization for heart failure, 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction. Hierarchical composite endpoint, assessed at 12 weeks from randomization (win-ratio method): * Rank 1: Time to all-cause death or cardiac transplantation or mechanical ventricular assist, * Rank 2: Time to rehospitalization for heart failure, * Rank 3: Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed during a research cardiac ultrasound.
  • Time to rehospitalization for heart failure. — 12-week after randomisation
    To compare the effect of early introduction of empagliflozin in addition to standard management versus standard management alone on composite endpoint components: 1. All-cause mortality or heart transplantation or ventricular assist, 2. Rehospitalization for heart failure, 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction. Hierarchical composite endpoint, assessed at 12 weeks from randomization (win-ratio method): * Rank 1: Time to all-cause death or cardiac transplantation or mechanical ventricular assist, * Rank 2: Time to rehospitalization for heart failure, * Rank 3: Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed during a research cardiac ultrasound.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by cardiac ultrasound. — 12-week after randomisation
    To compare the effect of early introduction of empagliflozin in addition to standard management versus standard management alone on composite endpoint components: 1. All-cause mortality or heart transplantation or ventricular assist, 2. Rehospitalization for heart failure, 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction. Hierarchical composite endpoint, assessed at 12 weeks from randomization (win-ratio method): * Rank 1: Time to all-cause death or cardiac transplantation or mechanical ventricular assist, * Rank 2: Time to rehospitalization for heart failure, * Rank 3: Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed during a research cardiac ultrasound.

Trial sites (8)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
CHR Metz - Thionville Ars-Laquenexy France Recruiting
CHU de Besançon Besançon France Recruiting
CHU de Dijon Bourgogne Dijon France Not Yet Recruiting
CHU Lille Lille France Not Yet Recruiting
CHU Reims Reims France Not Yet Recruiting
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg Strasbourg France Recruiting
CHRU de NANCY - réanimation médicale Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy France Recruiting
Chru Nancy - Usic Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy France Recruiting
Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT05879276 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in France