The Present Study Was Conducted to Evaluate Bioceramic Root Repair Material Versus Bio MTA in Revascularization of Immature Young Permenant Teeth.

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Revascularization of Immature Young Permenant Teeth: An access cavity was prepared under rubber dam, isolation, root canal system disinfection was done without mechanical instrumentation. Subsequently, triple antibiotic paste was placed into the apical portion of the canal and filled to just below the CEJ. The access cavity was temporarily restored with glass ionomer. 4 weeks later, after reopening of the access, the antibiotic paste was gently flushed out of the canal with sterile normal saline. The root canal system was irrigated. A sterile #35 K-file will be introduced into the canal beyond the apical foramen using a push and pull motion to provoke bleeding from the periapical tissue. After bleeding control and formation of fresh blood clot, 3 mm of Bio (MTA) will be placed in Group A, 3 mm of Total Fill biocearmic root repair material will be placed in Group B after a moist cotton pellet was placed over the capping material and the access cavity will be sealed with G C

Study summary

The present clinical study wasdirected to evaluate bioceramic root repair material versus Bio MTA in Revascularization of Immature Young Permenant Teeth through:

1. Clinical evaluation including: Pain, swelling, sinus or fistula, mobility and crown discoloration.
2. Radiographic evaluation including: Root lengthening, continued thickening of the dentinal walls, apical closure and regression of the peri-apical lesion.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• radiographic parameters — baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment
  continued root lengthening and thickening of the dentinal walls in mm

Trial sites (1)

More Al-Azhar University trials in Egypt

Other trials for the same condition