Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
To remove the uterine uterine ligament: Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.
Study summary
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Time required for patient surgery — 20-120minutes
Time required for patient surgery
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanchong Central Hospital | Nanchong | Sichuan | Recruiting |
More Nanchong Central Hospital trials in China
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06885788 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in China