The Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Patient Reported Outcomes in Young Breast Cancer Patients After Breast Surgery

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Breast-conserving surgery: Breast-conserving surgery

Mastectomy: Mastectomy without reconstruction

Mastectomy with reconstruction: Any type of reconstruction(include implant and autologous)

Study summary

Breast-conserving surgery is the standard treatment for young breast cancer patients, while mastectomy with breast reconstruction is an alternative for those who are not eligible for Breast-conserving surgery. Several studies have compared the quality of life and patient satisfaction among individuals receiving different types of surgery (Breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction). For example, Meghan R. demonstrated that patients undergoing Breast-conserving surgery experience a higher quality of life compared to those undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction, whereas J. Dauplat's study showed that patients who undergo mastectomy with breast reconstruction report a higher quality of life than those who undergo mastectomy alone.

However, the investigators hypothesize that the advantages of a specific type of surgery over another, such as Breast-conserving surgery versus breast reconstruction, may vary among patients with different socioeconomic factors. For instance, the benefits of breast reconstruction over Breast-conserving surgery might be more pronounced in young patients who require a more socially active lifestyle.

Additionally, the benefits of one type of surgery over another may also vary at different time points during post-operative follow-up. Furthermore, it is worth noting that most current studies have been conducted in Caucasian populations. In contrast to Caucasians, Asians typically have smaller breast volumes, potentially leading to more significant defects after Breast-conserving surgery and possibly poorer aesthetic outcomes. Therefore, a study focusing on Asian young breast cancer populations is necessary.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Participant's breast satisfaction assessed by BREAST-Q questionnaire version 2.0 — Pre-operation and 10 years
  Utilizing the BREAST-Q questionnaire, this measure assesses women's self-reported satisfaction with their breasts and associated quality of life, encompassing psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores indicating a more favorable outcome.Assessment is conducted preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively.
• Participant's health-related quality of life assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) — 10 years
  Assessed through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), this self-administered questionnaire consists of 30 items designed to evaluate the health-related quality of life among cancer patients. For questions 1 to 28, a 4-point scale is used, ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"), with lower scores indicating a more positive outcome. Questions 29 and 30 employ a 7-point scale, with scores ranging from 1 ("Very poor") to 7 ("Excellent"), where higher scores signify a better outcome.Assessment is conducted 10 years postoperatively.

Trial sites (1)

More Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University trials in China

Other trials for the same condition