Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Added to Oral Motor Therapy in Cerebral Palsy

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Oral Motor Therapy: Structured oral motor exercises will be applied to the lips, tongue, cheeks, and jaw. Facial massage and thermal stimulation (warm and cold) will be performed. Intraoral sensory stimulation will be applied using a brush, lemon juice, and a cold metal probe.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES): Active NMES will be applied bilaterally to the masseter muscles and to the orbicularis oris muscle in addition to oral motor therapy sessions, using a Chattanooga NMES device. Each application will be performed in cycles of 5 seconds of stimulation and 10 seconds of rest. The stimulation parameters will be set to a frequency of 10-15 Hz and a pulse width of 300 microseconds. The current intensity will be gradually increased to a level just above the motor threshold, sufficient to elicit a noticeable pulling sensation without causing discomfort, and will be adjusted according to each participant's tolerance. NMES will be delivered for a total duration of 15 minutes per session. For the electrical stimulation of the orbicularis oris muscle, a pen-type electrode will be used. In this procedure, four regions of the orbicularis oris muscle (upper, lower, right, and left) will be stimulated in two cycles of 45 pulses each.

Sham Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (Sham NMES): Simulated neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be applied without delivering active electrical current after oral motor therapy sessions to mimic the treatment experience without producing physiological effects.

Study summary

This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with oral motor therapy in reducing drooling severity among children with cerebral palsy. Participants will be allocated to an intervention group (oral motor therapy plus NMES), a control group (oral motor therapy alone) and a sham group (oral motor therapy with placebo NMES).

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Change in Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) Score — At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)
  The Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) is a validated clinical tool that assesses drooling in two domains: severity and frequency. Severity is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (dry; never drools) to 5 (profuse; clothing, hands, tray, and objects wet). Frequency is rated on a 4-point scale from 1 (never) to 4 (constantly). Higher scores in each subscale indicate more severe and frequent drooling. The total score reflects the combined impact of both dimensions.
• Change in Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) Score — At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)
  The Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) assesses the impact of drooling on daily life. It consists of 10 items, each scored from 1 (barely) to 10 (extremely), resulting in a total score range of 10 to 100. Higher scores indicate a greater negative impact of drooling on quality of life.

Trial sites (1)

Other trials for the same condition