Ireland
--:--IST
Starting soon Not applicable

Effects and Implementation of a Brief Version of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy

NCT07201090 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Sweden tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2025-10-01
Last updated
2025-10-01

Condition(s) studied

Conduct Disorders in ChildrenDisruptive BehaviorOppositional Defiant Disorder

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Brief Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with videos and virtual reality (360-degree VR)-films

Brief Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with videos and virtual reality (360-degree VR)-films: 10 sessions of PCIT delivered by trained psychologists, supplemented with videos and 360-degree VR-films Sessions follow the standard PCIT structure, with an initial phase focused on child-directed interaction, followed by a second, modified phase, focused on parent-directed interaction. To support skill learning, families are provided with digital materials including conventional video modules at home and 360-degree virtual reality (VR) films. The VR films are shown during two sessions at the clinic. Additional videos are available online through a platform for parents to view and practice between sessions. These tools allow parents to rehearse skills flexibly in their home environment and reinforce the in-session training.

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects and feasibility of a shortened version of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), supplemented with video vignettes of parenting skills and 360-virtual reality (VR)-films for parents of children aged 2-7 years with disruptive behavior problems. The main questions the study aims to answer, using a Single-Case Experimental Design, are:

1. How feasible and acceptable is the implementation of brief PCIT-VR in Sweden?
2. What are the preliminary effects of brief PCIT-VR?
3. How do parents and clinicians experience brief PCIT-VR?

Families at child and adolescent psychiatry clinics will receive up to 10 PCIT sessions. Caregivers complete quantitative assessments before, during, after treatment, and at 6-months follow-up, and are asked to participate in interviews after PCIT. Feasibility and acceptability of brief PCIT VR is evaluated, as well as effectiveness outcomes, including changes in child disruptive behavior and parenting skills. Within-group analyses will examine trends in outcome measures over time.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
2 Years
Max age
7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Child aged 2-7 years * Elevated disruptive behavior (ECBI score \>114) * Parent speaks Swedish or English Exclusion Criteria: * Child or family requiring more urgent intervention * Parent condition that prevents VR use (e.g., epilepsy, severe migraine, adverse VR experiences)

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • Mean change from screening in parent-ratings of child behavior problems on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) - Intensity scale — Screening (at inclusion), pre-treatment (treatment phase week 0), mid treatment (treatment phase week 6), post-treatment (treatment phase week 10), and at 6-months follow-up (6 months from pre-treatment assessment)
    Measures frequency of externalizing behaviors in children. The scale includes 36 items which are rated on a 7-point-scale (1 to 7). The total scale sum ranges from minimum 36 to a maximum sum of 252. Higher score indicates more disruptive behavior problems.
  • Mean change from screening in parent-ratings of child behavior problems on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory - Problem scale — Screening (at inclusion), pre-treatment (treatment phase week 0), mid treatment (treatment phase week 6), post-treatment (treatment phase week 10), and at 6-months follow-up (6 months from pre-treatment assessment)
    Measures externalizing behaviors in children. The scale includes 36 items which are rated yes/no (1-0), indicating whether the behavior is experienced as problematic. Minimum summary score is 0, maximum score is 36. Higher score indicates more disruptive behavior problems.
  • Change from baseline phase to treatment phase in weekly reported disruptive behavior — Weekly throughout baseline phase (baseline phase week 1-4) and treatment phase (treatment phase week 1-10).
    Three weekly questions on disruptive behavior rated on an 8 point scale from 0-7. Minimum summary score is 0, maximum score is 21. Higher score indicates more disruptive behaviors.

Trial sites (2)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Karolinska Institutet Solna Sweden
Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07201090 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Sweden