Clinical Performance of All-ceramic Posterior Crowns. A Randomized, Prospective Clinical.
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent: Type: monolithic lithium-disilicate glass ceramic
BruxZir, Glidewell: Type: high translucent zirconia
BruxZir*, Glidewell: Type: high translucent zirconia with a mini-veneer of porcelain
Study summary
This is a randomized, prospective clinical trial. The aim of the project is to assess the clinical performance of three types of tooth-supported crowns; monolithic high translucent colored zirconia, crowns of high-translucent colored zirconia with a mini-veneer buccally and crowns of lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic. Crowns will be placed on posterior teeth and evaluated from an esthetic and functional point of view, to identify if there are any differences between the materials.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Clinical perfomance — 12 month
To identify if there are any differences between the materials. The marginal integrity and surface will be rated as excellent, acceptable, retrievable or not acceptable according to a modified California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system. - Clinical perfomance — 24 month
To identify if there are any differences between the materials. The marginal integrity and surface will be rated as excellent, acceptable, retrievable or not acceptable according to a modified California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system. - Clinical perfomance — 36 month
To identify if there are any differences between the materials. The marginal integrity and surface will be rated as excellent, acceptable, retrievable or not acceptable according to a modified California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system. - Clinical perfomance — 60 month
To identify if there are any differences between the materials. The marginal integrity and surface will be rated as excellent, acceptable, retrievable or not acceptable according to a modified California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system. - Clinical performance — 120 months
To identify if there are any differences between the materials. The marginal integrity and surface will be rated as excellent, acceptable, retrievable or not acceptable according to a modified California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malmö University | Malmö | Sweden |
More Malmö University trials in Sweden
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT04272112 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Sweden