Thoracoscopic Versus Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Enlarged Left Atrium
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Thoracoscopic ablation: Thoracoscopic surgical ablation is performed according to the standard technique. Pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage exclusion are mandatory. Additional lesions are at the operator's discretion.
Percutaneous catheter ablation: Percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation is performed using radiofrequency, cryoballoon, or pulsed field energy. Pulmonary vein isolation is mandatory. Additional lesions are at the operator's discretion.
Study summary
This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing thoracoscopic surgical ablation with percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation as the first rhythm-control procedure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and an enlarged left atrium (LA diameter ≥50 mm or LA volume index ≥45 mL/m²).
A total of 194 patients who have never undergone an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation will be randomly assigned 1:1 to thoracoscopic ablation or percutaneous catheter ablation, stratified by duration of atrial fibrillation. The primary endpoint is recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) after a 3-month blanking period. The investigators hypothesize that thoracoscopic ablation will significantly reduce recurrence compared with catheter ablation in this population.
A secondary hypothesis is that 14-day patch monitoring detects recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia more sensitively than conventional 24-hour Holter monitoring.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia — From 3 months after the index procedure until 1 year after enrollment of the last patient
Recurrence of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia, defined as an episode documented on 12-lead ECG or sustained for at least 30 seconds on continuous monitoring (14-day patch monitor or 24-hour Holter). Recurrences during the 3-month blanking period are not counted as events.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Medical Center | Seoul | Seoul | Recruiting |
More Samsung Medical Center trials in South Korea
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07783984 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in South Korea