A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Giredestrant Compared With Physician's Choice of Endocrine Monotherapy in Participants With Previously Treated Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (acelERA Breast Cancer)

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Giredestrant: Giredestrant is taken orally once per day on Days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle.

Fulvestrant or an Aromatase Inhibitor (Physician Choice): Physician choice of endocrine monotherapy (fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor) is taken in accordance with the local prescribing information for the respective product.

LHRH Agonist: Only premenopausal/perimenopausal participants and male participants will receive a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist on Day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle. The investigator will determine and supply the appropriate LHRH agonist locally approved for use in breast cancer.

Study summary

This Phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of giredestrant compared with physician's choice of endocrine monotherapy in participants with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have received one or two prior lines of systemic therapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) — From randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (duration of follow-up, median [range]: 7.9 [0.0-14.1] months)
  PFS was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause (whichever occurs first). Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression in non-target lesions, and/or appearance of new lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate median PFS. The 95% confidence interval for the median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Participants without the occurrence of disease progression or death as of the clinical cutoff were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment prior to the clinical cutoff or at the time of randomization plus 1 day for those without post-baseline assessment.

Trial sites (81)

+ 41 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.

More Hoffmann-La Roche trials in South Korea