Psychological Intervention on Cold Executive Function and Academic Performance in University Women With Insomnia

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Psychological Program to Improve Sleep Quality: The intervention consists of a structured psychological program designed to improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms in female university students. Sleep hygiene: Minimally invasive behavioral recommendations are implemented to establish healthy habits and routines that promote sleep onset and continuity. Relaxation techniques: Strategies are used to decrease physiological and cognitive activation prior to sleep. Stimulus control: This technique aims to reduce the negative association between the bedroom and difficulty sleeping. The intervention is delivered in a structured and supervised format, with the goal of promoting sustainable behavioral and cognitive changes that improve sleep quality. The intervention will be conducted weekly in group sessions lasting approximately one hour. The researcher will administer the intervention.

Study summary

Sleep disturbances, particularly insomnia, are highly prevalent among university women and are associated with impairments in executive functioning and academic performance. Women present higher rates of insomnia due to biological and psychosocial factors. This study aims to design and evaluate a psychological intervention program to improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms in female university students aged 18-25, with the purpose of strengthening cold executive functions and analyzing its impact on academic performance.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Sleep Quality — Pre-post intervention evaluation, after 8 weeks.
  Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 1989) is a self-report instrument designed to assess sleep quality and sleep disturbances over the past month. It evaluates seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. These components generate an overall score that allows differentiation between people who sleep well and people who sleep poorly. Its psychometric properties have demonstrated adequate levels of reliability and validity. Furthermore, it exhibits good sensitivity and specificity for identifying clinically significant sleep problems and is therefore considered a valid and reliable instrument for assessing sleep quality. It evaluates sleep over the past month using 19 self administered questions, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21 points. An overall score \> 5 indicates poor sleep quality while a score ≤ 5 suggests adequate sleep quality

Trial sites (1)

More Universidad Autonoma de Baja California trials in Mexico

Other trials for the same condition