Telerehabilitation With Digital Technologies for the Continuum of Care of Stroke Patients
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Integrated Treatment with Digital Tools: Patients will undergo a 6-week remote telerehabilitation program. The recommended frequency of treatment is a minimum of 3 sessions per week, but patients may adjust the schedule in agreement with their assigned therapist. If a patient is unable to complete at least 18 sessions due to clinical reasons, they will be considered as a dropout. Moreover, one session per week will be conducted synchronously, with the therapist remotely supervising the patient's activities in real time, while the remaining sessions will be asynchronous, allowing the patient to complete the exercises independently.
Home-Based Educational Program: Patients will be monitored over a six-week period through weekly phone calls to assess their progress and overall condition. Additionally, participants are required to maintain an activity diary to document their engagement with the prescribed activities.
Study summary
The goal of the pragmatic study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based telerehabilitation protocol for patients with post-stroke disabilities, compared to a home-based educational program.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Is home-based neuromotor and cognitive rehabilitation using digital tools more effective than a traditional educational program for improving static and dynamic balance in patients with subacute and chronic stroke? Researchers will compare the outcome (Berg Balance Scale) measured at baseline with the outcome after treatment to test its effectiveness.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Change from baseline in the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) — Baseline; within 7 days after the end of the 6-week observation/rehabilitation period
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. It does not include the assessment of gait.
Trial sites (13)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Centro Gala | Acerenza | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri | Bari | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino | Genova | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| COT, Cure Ortopediche Traumatologiche, Istituto Clinico Polispecialistico | Messina | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente | Milan | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri | Milan | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri | Montescano | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| IRCCS Fondazione Mondino | Pavia | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Centro Santa Maria della Provvidenza | Rome | Italy | Recruiting |
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Centro Santa Maria al Mare | Salerno | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Polo Specialistico Riabilitativo | Sant'Angelo dei Lombardi | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri | Telese Terme | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Polo specialistico riabilitativo | Tricarico | Italy | Not Yet Recruiting |
More Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS trials in Italy
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06978413 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Italy