ESWT vs Orthosis in Trigger Finger
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
shock waves: three sessions, weekly frequency
Study summary
Recently, two works have proposed the application of Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of trigger finger. Yildirim and colleagues (2016) compared shock waves with corticosteroid infiltration. both methods proved effective at 6 months. The authors suggested that shock wave treatment could be a valid non-invasive therapy option for this pathology. Chen and colleagues (2021) analyzed two different shock wave protocols \[high and low Energy Density Flux (EDF)\] vs placebo. All treatment groups showed improvements within 6 months. The high-energy treatment (EDF 0.01 mj/mm2) demonstrated greater effects on clinical remission and functional recovery compared to the other two groups in the study. The aim of our study is to compare the effects of shock waves vs the use of the orthosis.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- recovery of pain — From enrollment to 1, 3 and 6 months
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angela Notarnicola | Bari | Italy |
More Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari trials in Italy
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06737601 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Italy