Prospective Evaluation of Biophysical Parameters as Long-term Predictors of Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
pulmonary vein (PV) isolation: The settings used during ablation will be for both groups: 15W, unipolar; 5ml/min baseline irrigation, 35ml/min irrigation during inflation/RF application; 55°C target electrode temperature; RF application time 60s for anterior electrodes, 20s for posterior electrodes. The catheter insertion in Pulmonary vein and ablation workflow will be different for two groups.
Study summary
Current, worldwide assessments of the prevalence of AF estimate that 33 million people are affected by this cardiac arrhythmia. As the most common sustained atrial arrhythmia, AF has a well-established association with systemic embolic events, stroke, heart failure, and increased mortality. Current treatment guidelines and consensus statements for patients with AF suggest that most patients should be first managed with a pharmaceutical drug therapy; however, when a patient becomes drug refractory (intolerant or non-responsive), catheter ablation by PV isolation (PVI) is recommended.
The aim of PVI is abolishment of all conducted electrical activity beyond the isolating lesions.
The recent NICE guidelines have established that today RF point-by-point ablation is the most cost-effective treatment approach over a lifetime after failure of 1 or more anti-arrhythmic drugs5, but until now a new technology, HELIOSTAR, RF Balloon, has not been included in this cost-effectiveness analysis
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Pulmonary vein single shot isolation — 12 months
The primary objective of this study is PV single shot isolation in acute and at 1-3-6-12 months follow up with stringent monitoring including medical examination (Echo, ECG, and 24h-Holter).. It will be assessed the time necessary to reach the isolation, the number of erogations, the fluoroscopy dose and any use of contrast medium and they will be compared between the two arms. Our aim is to demonstrate that, even in the case of equivalent relapse rates during the follow up, the CARTO guided approach allows patients to benefit from a faster and less invasive procedure compared to the fluoroscopy guided method. This occurs because the former doesn't require contrast medium and the fluoroscopy time is notably reduced.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Cecilia Hospital | Cotignola | Ravenna |
More Maria Cecilia Hospital trials in Italy
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT05805189 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Italy