A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CAEL-101 in Patients With Mayo Stage IIIb AL Amyloidosis (CARES)
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
CAEL-101: The investigational product, CAEL-101, is formulated as a sterile liquid solution of protein plus excipients for dilution in a single-use, stoppered, glass vial. Each 10 mL vial contains 300 mg of CAEL-101 at a concentration of 30 mg/mL. CAEL-101 will be diluted with commercially available 0.9% Normal Saline.
Placebo: Commercially available 0.9% Normal Saline will be used as the placebo.
cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) regimen: According to institutional standard of care.
Study summary
AL (or light chain) amyloidosis begins in the bone marrow where abnormal proteins misfold and create free light chains that cannot be broken down. These free light chains bind together to form amyloid fibrils that build up in the extracellular space of organs, affecting the kidneys, heart, liver, spleen, nervous system and digestive tract.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether CAEL-101, a monoclonal antibody that removes AL amyloid deposits from tissues and organs, improves overall survival, reduces cardiovascular related hospitalizations and it is safe and well tolerated in patients with stage IIIb AL amyloidosis.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- A Hierarchical Combination of Time to All-cause Mortality and Frequency of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations (CVHs) Analyzed by Win Ratio — Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, the primary analysis for the study was conducted 18-47 months after the study randomization.)
Time to all-cause mortality was defined as the number of weeks from the date of randomization to the date of death if it is on or before the end of PETP. Participants alive at the end of PETP (LPI+18 months) were censored at their last known alive date recorded within the PETP. CVHs were events adjudicated and confirmed as such by the Clinical Event Adjudication Committee (CEAC). Hypothesis testing with the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and treatment effect estimation with the win-ratio method based on pairwise comparisons of participant outcomes with comparisons performed in a hierarchical manner. To calculate win ratio, participant outcomes based on time to all-cause mortality were first compared and if there was no 'winner' due to censoring then a comparison based on frequency of cardiovascular hospitalization was made. A win ratio \>1 represents a more favorable outcome for CAEL-101 over placebo. - Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) — Day 1 through end of the participant's PETP (Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis. Therefore, the primary analysis for the study was conducted 18-47 months after the study randomization.)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, at any dose, that was not necessarily related to the treatment. A TEAE was an AE with an occurrence defined as follows: last study intervention day-first study intervention day + 140 days. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
Trial sites (90)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Duarte | California | |
| Research Site | Palo Alto | California | |
| Research Site | San Francisco | California | |
| Research Site | Weston | Florida | |
| Research Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | |
| Research Site | New Orleans | Louisiana | |
| Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | |
| Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | |
| Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | |
| Research Site | Detroit | Michigan | |
| Research Site | Rochester | Minnesota | |
| Research Site | St Louis | Missouri | |
| Research Site | New York | New York | |
| Research Site | New York | New York | |
| Research Site | Rochester | New York | |
| Research Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | |
| Research Site | Cleveland | Ohio | |
| Research Site | Columbus | Ohio | |
| Research Site | Portland | Oregon | |
| Research Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | |
| Research Site | Nashville | Tennessee | |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | |
| Research Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | |
| Research Site | Seattle | Washington | |
| Research Site | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | |
| Research Site | Box Hill | Australia | |
| Research Site | Brisbane | Australia | |
| Research Site | Westmead | Australia | |
| Research Site | Linz | Austria | |
| Research Site | Vienna | Austria | |
| Research Site | Anderlecht | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Leuven | Belgium | |
| Research Site | Porto Alegre | Brazil | |
| Research Site | Ribeirão Preto | Brazil | |
| Research Site | Salvador | Brazil | |
| Research Site | São José do Rio Preto | Brazil | |
| Research Site | Calgary | Alberta | |
| Research Site | Edmonton | Alberta | |
| Research Site | Toronto | Ontario |
+ 50 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.
More Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. trials in Italy
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT04504825 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Italy