Evaluation of the Efficacy and Acceptability of a Phytotherapy Combining Devil's Claw, Blackcurrant and Meadowsweet for the Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Arthralgia in Patients Treated for Localized Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant Setting

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Phytotherapy Dietary Supplement (Harpagophytum, Meadowsweet, and Blackcurrant): Administration of an oral herbal dietary supplement combining Devil's claw (Harpagophytum procumbens), Meadowsweet (Filipendula ulmaria), and Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum). The product is provided in capsule dosage form at a dose of 2 capsules twice daily (4 capsules per day) for a duration of 21 consecutive days, taken concomitantly with the patient's ongoing adjuvant hormone therapy to manage joint pain.

Patient Experience Questionnaire: Administration of an ad hoc questionnaire utilizing Likert scales, conducted via telephone interview at Day 21. This tool evaluates the patient's feedback on three key implementation dimensions based on Proctor's framework: acceptability (overall perception, perceived satisfaction, and encountered difficulties), appropriateness (perceived relevance and suitability of the intervention), and feasibility.

Study summary

Adjuvant hormonotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for localized hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, accounting for approximately 80% of patients. The main classes used are selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs, including tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane), with or without LH-RH agonists (leuprorelin, goserelin), administered daily for 5 to 8 years.

However, these treatments are frequently associated with adverse events, predominantly musculoskeletal disorders such as arthralgia, which can significantly impair quality of life. These symptoms cause functional impact and promote premature discontinuation of treatment, thereby compromising therapeutic adherence and increasing the risk of tumor relapse.

Current management strategies for these arthralgias, whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological, show limited efficacy or insufficient levels of evidence, with the exception of certain approaches like acupuncture. In the absence of satisfactory solutions, many patients turn to alternative medicines, notably phytotherapy. However, these practices raise safety concerns (drug interactions, misuse) and rely on limited scientific evidence, especially since they are often underreported to healthcare professionals.

In this context, there is a clear need to rigorously evaluate new therapeutic approaches. The non-randomized ERABLE study aims to explore the efficacy and acceptability of a phytotherapy selected for its analgesic properties on hormone therapy-induced arthralgia in patients treated for localized breast cancer. If positive, this study will be followed by a randomized trial to confirm efficacy and achieve a level of evidence compatible with clinical guidelines.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Change in joint pain score from baseline to day 21 — Baseline (Day 0) and Day 21 (+ 3 days)
  Joint pain intensity is self-reported by the patient using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain." The primary outcome is calculated as the change in the NRS score from baseline (Day 0) to Day 21, comparing the interventional group with the matched external control group.

Trial sites (3)

More Hospices Civils de Lyon trials in France

Other trials for the same condition