Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA): Performed in consultation under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia, using a manual vacuum aspirator and appropriate cannula. Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
Electric aspiration (EA): Performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, using an electric suction device and appropriate cannula. Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
Study summary
The ASPIR study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared with operating room electric aspiration for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. It is hypothesized that manual aspiration will demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and patient quality of life while reducing healthcare costs.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) — 3 months
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of outpatient MVA compared to operating room EA, from a collective perspective.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Nantes | Nantes | France |
More Nantes University Hospital trials in France
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07732231 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in France