Disarticulation Septoplasty Versus Classical Way
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Comparison of functional improvement in nasal breathing between the two techniques using questionnaires administered to patients by their practitioners in routine practice: Comparison of functional improvement in nasal breathing between the two techniques using questionnaires administered to patients by their practitioners in routine practice
Study summary
The objective of this study is to determine which of the two techniques (disarticulation septoplasty versus open surgery) offers the best functional results for correcting symptomatic deviations of the nasal septum.
More specifically it's about:
* Compare the improvement in respiratory symptoms between the two techniques
* Analyze and compare complication rates between the two techniques
* Evaluate patient satisfaction with aesthetic results (including columella deviation)
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- To determine which of the two techniques (disarticulation septoplasty versus open surgery) offers the best functional results to correct symptomatic nasal septum deviations — Before and at least 3 months after the operation
Comparison of functional improvement in nasal breathing between the two techniques (disarticulation septoplasty versus classic septoplasty), using the standardized NOSE score routinely completed by patients pre-operatively and then 3 months post-operation.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hopital Novo | Pontoise | France |
More Hôpital NOVO trials in France
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07412340 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in France