International Multicenter Project Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Implantable Defibrillator After Well-tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease With Minimally Impaired Ejection Fraction

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Adverse events collection: Collection of deaths from any cause, hospitalizations or emergency consultations for any event related to ventricular arrhythmia or its treatment (recurrence of ventricular tachycardia or complication linked to the defibrillator or crossover from one group to another)

Quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: Questionnaire on the patient's quality of life and health in 6 questions: on mobility, the person's autonomy, current activities, pain, anxiety. Answers range from "no problem" to "unable" and 5 possible answers to each question. The last question concerns the patient's health, the patient must rate his or her health on a scale of 0 to 100

Medical-economic evaluation: Collection of expenses incurred by the care of patients in each arm will be collected over a period of 36 months. Direct medical and non-medical costs as well as costs related to absences from the workplace will be included in the analysis. Healthcare consumption will be collected using the National Health Data System (SNDS).

Study summary

Evidence for the usefulness of the defibrillator in cases of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia (without cardiocirculatory arrest or syncope) is lacking, as no previous trials have included such patients. Additionally, sudden death in this particular population is low compared to other subgroups of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

On the other hand, numerous recent retrospective data show that ablation of ventricular tachycardia can reduce mortality, and also clearly reduces the number of recurrences in prospective studies.

Finally, a very low rate of sudden death was observed in a multicenter European retrospective study that we conducted, including patients with well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease with minimally impaired ejection fraction and benefiting from ablation without implantation of defibrillator.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Monitoring for the occurrence of at least one serious event during the 36 months of follow-up — 36 months
  Monitoring of the occurrence of death from any cause, hospitalization or emergency consultation for any event related to ventricular arrhythmia or its treatment (recurrence of ventricular tachycardia or complication linked to the defibrillator or crossover from one group to another)

Trial sites (1)

More University Hospital, Toulouse trials in France

Other trials for the same condition