Evaluation the Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement Using SocketFit Static Surgical Guide Versus Conventional Static Surgical Guide in Anterior Esthetic Zone
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
SocketFit Static Surgical Guide: Participants will undergo immediate implant placement in the anterior esthetic zone using the SocketFit static surgical guide. The guide incorporates a socket-engaging extension designed to enhance guide stability and drilling accuracy following atraumatic tooth extraction. Implant placement will be performed according to the planned digital workflow.
Conventional Static Surgical Guide: Participants allocated to the control group will undergo immediate implant placement in the anterior esthetic zone using a conventional tooth-supported static surgical guide designed through the standard digital workflow. Following atraumatic tooth extraction, the guide will be seated on the remaining teeth to direct sequential osteotomy preparation and implant placement according to the preoperative virtual implant plan. All other surgical procedures, implant system, drilling protocol, and postoperative management will be identical to those used in the experimental group.
Study summary
This study compares two types of surgical guides used during immediate dental implant placement in the upper front teeth. One guide is a conventional static surgical guide, while the other is a modified SocketFit static surgical guide designed to improve stability after tooth extraction. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the SocketFit guide improves the accuracy of implant placement.The findings may help improve the precision and predictability of immediate dental implant treatment in the anterior esthetic zone.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Coronal deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
The linear distance (mm) between the planned and actual implant positions at the coronal platform, measured by digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data. - apical deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
The linear distance (mm) between the planned and actual implant positions at the implant apex, measured using digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data. - depth(vertical) deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
The vertical difference (mm) between the planned and actual implant positions along the implant long axis, measured using digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data. - angular deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
The angular difference (degrees) between the long axes of the planned and actual implant positions, measured using digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data.
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Periodontology Clinic at Faculty of Dentistry Tanta University | Tanta | Gharbia Governorate | Recruiting |
More Tanta University trials in Egypt
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07760974 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt