Ireland
--:--IST
Recruiting Not applicable

Evaluation the Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement Using SocketFit Static Surgical Guide Versus Conventional Static Surgical Guide in Anterior Esthetic Zone

NCT07760974 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Egypt tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-13

Condition(s) studied

Conventional Static Surgical GuideSocketFit Static Surgical Guide

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

SocketFit Static Surgical GuideConventional Static Surgical Guide

SocketFit Static Surgical Guide: Participants will undergo immediate implant placement in the anterior esthetic zone using the SocketFit static surgical guide. The guide incorporates a socket-engaging extension designed to enhance guide stability and drilling accuracy following atraumatic tooth extraction. Implant placement will be performed according to the planned digital workflow.

Conventional Static Surgical Guide: Participants allocated to the control group will undergo immediate implant placement in the anterior esthetic zone using a conventional tooth-supported static surgical guide designed through the standard digital workflow. Following atraumatic tooth extraction, the guide will be seated on the remaining teeth to direct sequential osteotomy preparation and implant placement according to the preoperative virtual implant plan. All other surgical procedures, implant system, drilling protocol, and postoperative management will be identical to those used in the experimental group.

Study summary

This study compares two types of surgical guides used during immediate dental implant placement in the upper front teeth. One guide is a conventional static surgical guide, while the other is a modified SocketFit static surgical guide designed to improve stability after tooth extraction. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the SocketFit guide improves the accuracy of implant placement.The findings may help improve the precision and predictability of immediate dental implant treatment in the anterior esthetic zone.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients in good health with absence of any relevant medical condition that contraindicates dental implant placement e.g. blood coagulation disorder. * Optimal compliance is evidenced by no missed treatment appointments and a positive attitude toward oral hygiene. * Extraction socket type I according to Ellian et al criteria with adequate native/apical bone to achieve primary implant stability and intact buccal plate of bone. * Thick mucosal phenotype. * Probing depth ≤ 3 mm at mid-buccal aspect of failing tooth. * Age ranged from 18- 35 years old of both genders. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area. * Bisphosphonate therapy. * Females who are pregnant or trying to conceive, and nursing mothers. * Smokers and uncontrolled diabetic patients.

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • Coronal deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
    The linear distance (mm) between the planned and actual implant positions at the coronal platform, measured by digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data.
  • apical deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
    The linear distance (mm) between the planned and actual implant positions at the implant apex, measured using digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data.
  • depth(vertical) deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
    The vertical difference (mm) between the planned and actual implant positions along the implant long axis, measured using digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data.
  • angular deviation — Immediately after implant placement following digital superimposition of the planned and actual implant positions.
    The angular difference (degrees) between the long axes of the planned and actual implant positions, measured using digital superimposition of the preoperative implant plan and postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data.

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Periodontology Clinic at Faculty of Dentistry Tanta University Tanta Gharbia Governorate Recruiting
Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07760974 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt