Utilizing Anti-Factor Xa as a Predictive Tool for Optimizing Outcome in Burn Patients' Management
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
follow up venous thrombo embolic events with routine clexan dose modification guided by anti factor 10 assay: follow up vte incidence and routine clexan dose modification
follow up venous thromboembolic events with no routine clexan dosage modification and no usage of anti factor 10 assay: follow up of vte incidence with no routine dose modification unless indicated
Study summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy of anti-Xa based versus weight-based enoxaparin dosing and to evaluate anti-Xa levels as a predictive tool for clinical outcomes in burn patients
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- VTE incidence — from incidence of burn injury and start of anticoagulation till 30day post burn or till discharge from ICU
Incidence of 30-day symptomatic VTE (confirmed by Doppler ultrasound or CT angiography) in anti-Xa-guided vs. fixed-dose enoxaparin group
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Abbassia | Recruiting |
More Ain Shams University trials in Egypt
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT07464808 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt