Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Continuous adductor canal block: Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule: Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Study summary
This study aims to evaluate the effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block only versus adding posterior knee block, known as the Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block with Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) after arthroscopic knee surgeries.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Degree of pain — 24 hours postoperatively
The degree of pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. No pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Egypt | Recruiting |
More Ain Shams University trials in Egypt
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06802419 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt