Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Acetazolamide: 1\. 500 mg IV bolus of acetazolamide at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- Metolazone tablet together with each acetazolamide-injection.
Metolazone 2.5 MG: 2\. 2.5 mg oral Metolazone at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- acetazolamide injection together with each metolazone-tablet.
Double-placebo: This arm will also receive both a placebo-acetazolamide injection together with a placebo-metolazone-tablet at randomization and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3).
Study summary
Aim to identify the best strategy for treating acute heart failure (AHF) with volume overload, particularly focusing on patients resistant to standard loop-diuretics. The trial is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Its primary objective is to compare the efficacy of loop-diuretics combined with either Metolazone or Acetazolamide, against loop-diuretics alone. The trial will also determine the optimal type of loop-diuretic to use.
Eligible participants include adults over 18 years hospitalized with AHF and volume overload, showing signs of congestion and at risk of diuretic resistance. Exclusions apply to those with acute coronary syndrome, low systolic blood pressure, prior renal therapy, or previous treatment with Acetazolamide or Metolazone.
The primary outcome is the number of days alive and out-of-hospital by day 30. Secondary outcomes include a composite clinical benefit at 30 days, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and successful decongestion 72 hours post-inclusion.
The trial aims to enroll about 1,041,939 patients across three treatment arms over three years. The minimal important difference is set as a reduction in out-of-hospital days by at least two days, with an anticipated low dropout rate. The study's power is calculated to be 80% with an adjusted alpha level for comparing the three diuretic groups.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Days alive out-of-hospital to day 30 — 30 days
Days alive out-of-hospital to day 30
Trial sites (5)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amager-Hvidovre Hospital | Hvidovre | Capital Region of Denmark | Recruiting |
| Aarhus university Hospital | Aarhus | Denmark | Recruiting |
| Bispebjerg Hospital | Copenhagen | Denmark | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Herlev-Gentofte hospital | Copenhagen | Denmark | Recruiting |
| Zealand University Hospital | Roskilde | Denmark | Recruiting |
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06166654 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Denmark