DISTRESS Trial Functional Disorders - the DISTRESS Trial
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Diagnostic evaluation at the Diagnostic Clinic for Functional Disorders: The intervention consists of being examined at the Diagnostic Clinic for Functional Disorders. If an FSD diagnosis is established, the patient receives feed-back of on the FSD diagnosis and patient education about the condition. Subsequently, the clinic provides guidance to the GP regarding recommended management and treatment options tailored to each individual patient.
Diagnostic as usual: "Diagnostic as usual" consists in being referred to be examined at another existing specialist clinic in the secondary sector, as specified by the patient's GP.
Study summary
A Diagnostic Clinic for Functional Somatic Disorders (FSD) has been set up at the outpatient diagnostic center at Regionshospitalet Silkeborg. The objective of the clinic is to support General Practitioners (GPs) by offering early stage diagnostic evaluation of whether a patient has an FSD or the symptoms were caused by another physical illness or mental disorder.
As a novelty in this project, Internal Medicine consultants examine the patients for FSD, after having received training in diagnosing FSD by FSD experts. By performing diagnostic evaluation for physical diseases and FSD simultaneously, the investigators believe that the new clinic shall be able to accelerate the establishment of a final diagnosis for these patients who would otherwise likely undergo a protracted diagnostic course involving sequential evaluations at various specialty clinics.
The DISTRESS trial is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial which aims to evaluate the Diagnostic Clinic for FSD in terms of clinical cost-effectiveness outcomes.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Healthcare services utilization (i.e. direct costs) — 12 months prior to randomization and 12 months' follow-up
Comparison of healthcare services utilization (of secondary and tertiary sector care) by the intervention group, compared to the control group. Data shall be drawn from Danish national and regional healthcare service registers. - Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) (direct and indirect costs) — 12 months prior to randomization and 12 months' follow-up
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), comparing the intervention and the control group from both a healthcare (direct costs) and a societal perspective (indirect costs) combining data on incremental costs and incremental effects; adjusted for differences in mean utility score and mean costs at baseline (1 year prior to randomization).
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regionshospitalet Silkeborg | Silkeborg | Denmark |
More Regionshospitalet Silkeborg trials in Denmark
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06025617 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Denmark