Application of Patient Knowledge Questionnaire on Pulmonary Hypertension
Application of Patient Knowledge Questionnaire on Pulmonary Hypertension: Participants will complete one version of the SAVOIR questionnaire, developed to assess patient knowledge about pulmonary arterial hypertension. Depending on the study phase, participants will contribute to content validation (expert judges), semantic validation (patients), or psychometric validation (patients). In the final phase, additional data including risk stratification (COMPERA 2.0) will be collected for correlational analysis.
Study summary
This methodological study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire named for the Assessment of Patient Knowledge in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. The study will be conducted in four phases: (1) questionnaire development based on guidelines and literature; (2) content validation by expert judges; (3) semantic validation with patients; and (4) psychometric testing in a sample of up to 200 patients with confirmed pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
In addition to validation, the study will collect clinical and functional data from medical records, including risk stratification using the COMPERA 2.0 method The final instrument is expected to support patient education strategies and contribute to improved clinical management of PAH.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adults aged 18 years or older
* Confirmed diagnosis of Group 1 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)
* Ability to read and understand the questionnaire language
* Provided informed consent to participate in the study
* For expert judges (content validation phase): professionals with recognized expertise in pulmonary hypertension, with academic or clinical experience in the field
Exclusion Criteria:
* Cognitive, visual, or auditory impairments that hinder questionnaire comprehension
* Refusal to participate or withdrawal of informed consent
* Inability to complete the questionnaire due to clinical instability
Primary outcome measure(s)
Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Questionnaire Items — 4 weeks after expert panel review Proportion of agreement among expert judges regarding the relevance and clarity of each item. Items with CVI ≥ 0.80 will be considered valid.
Semantic Clarity Rating by Patients — 2 weeks after patient interview Assessment of the clarity and comprehension of each item by patients using a structured form. Items with ≥ 85% of patients rating them as clear or very clear will be considered semantically valid.
Internal Consistency of the Questionnaire (Cronbach's Alpha) — 4 weeks after questionnaire completion Psychometric evaluation of the final version of the SAVOIR questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha. A coefficient ≥ 0.70 will be considered acceptable. The analysis will be conducted in a sample of up to 200 patients.
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo
São Paulo
Recruiting
More University of Sao Paulo General Hospital trials in Brazil
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.