Aerobic Training Versus Behavioral Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Patients With Asthma

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Behavioral Intervention to Increase Physical Activity: The educational program will consist of 2 classes held once a week, each lasting 90 minutes. The classes will be based on an education videotape, presentations and group discussions. The first class will address the asthma education. The second class will be about the current international physical activity recommendations and the importance and benefits of being physically active. The behavioural intervention will be performed in 8 weekly goal-setting consultation, face-to-face, each lasting until 90 minutes. Patients will be offered a commercially-available activity tracker to wear during 3 days prior to each consultation. According to their own physical activity (PA) data and the behavioural change stage, an individual action plan will be established to increase physical activity. Each participant will receive individual counselling with the goal of increasing participation in PA and reducing their sedentary time.

Aerobic Training: The same initial educational program described for the Behavioral Intervention group will be delivered to this group. Each aerobic training session will consist of 45 minutes divided into 5 minutes of warm-up, 35 minutes of aerobic exercise and 5 minutes of cool-down. During physical training, heart rate and level of respiratory distress will be monitored. The intensity of aerobic physical training will be based on the heart rate (HR) corresponding to one third of the difference between the anaerobic threshold (LA) and the respiratory compensation point (CRP). The patient may interrupt physical exercise if he presents any clinical symptoms and/or respiratory discomfort, returning as soon as his respiratory condition improves.

Study summary

To compare the effects of aerobic training and behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in the clinical control of asthma and in the quality of life of patients with asthma.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Change in asthma clinical control — [Change from baseline at 8 weeks of intervention and at 16 weeks post intervention]
  Clinical control will be evaluated by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The ACQ contains 7 items rated on a 7- point scale (0 = without limitation, 6 = maximum limitation), with a higher score indicating worse control. Scores lower than 0.75 are associated with good asthma control, whereas scores greater than 1.5 are indicative of poorly controlled asthma, and a change of at least 0.5 points in the ACQ score is regarded as clinically significant.

Trial sites (1)

More University of Sao Paulo General Hospital trials in Brazil

Other trials for the same condition