face-to-face teaching: face-to-face teaching of breastfeeding
Study summary
This study aims to explore the impact of interactive breastfeeding e-books on nursing students' breastfeeding learning outcomes. The subjects are third-year nursing students from a university in central Taiwan. A randomized controlled design will be adopted. The experimental group will use interactive breastfeeding e-books for learning, while the control group will use traditional face-to-face courses to evaluate the changes in students' breastfeeding knowledge, skills, and learning motivation. The expected results can provide a reference for innovative teaching models in nursing education and promote the future clinical promotion of breastfeeding.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
20 Years
Max age
30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
1. It is expected to include 100 people.
2. Age 20 to 30 years old.
3. A third-year nursing student.
4. Studying obstetrics and gynecology nursing this semester.
5. Agree to participate in this study and sign the research consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
1 .Students who are planning to take a leave of absence at the time of data collection.
2.Students who have not taken obstetrics and gynecology nursing this semester or have taken it in the past.
3.Students who are unable to use 3C products.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Breastfeeding Knowledge Questionnaire — The experimental group and the control group will Baseline (prior to intervention), immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention This questionnaire consists of 10 multiple-choice questions. Each correct answer is scored 10 points, and each incorrect answer is scored 0 points, yielding a total score range of 0-100. The questions were self-developed in the form of clinical scenario-based multiple-choice items, focusing on the benefits of breastfeeding, breastfeeding positions, breast milk storage methods, breast milk expression (hand expression), and nursing interventions to maintain milk supply.
Breastfeeding Skills Assessment Scale — The experimental group and the control group will Baseline (prior to intervention), immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention Breastfeeding skills were assessed using a "Breastfeeding Skills Assessment Scale," which includes 20 steps such as hand hygiene before procedures, self-introduction, patient identification, ensuring privacy, explaining the purpose and process, breastfeeding positions, and hand expression techniques. Each step is scored as follows: completely correct = 5 points, partially correct = 3 points, and incorrect = 0 points. The total score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better application of breastfeeding skills.
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale — The experimental group and the control group will Baseline (prior to intervention), immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention Breastfeeding self-efficacy was evaluated using a 10-item Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, where 1 = not at all capable and 4 = expert level. The total score ranges from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy in performing breastfeeding skills.
ARCS-Based Learning Motivation Scale — The experimental group and the control group will Baseline (prior to intervention), immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention The scale assesses learners' motivation toward the educational materials across four dimensions: Attention (12 items), Relevance (9 items), Confidence (9 items), and Satisfaction (6 items), for a total of 36 items. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 5 ("Strongly Agree") to 1 ("Strongly Disagree"). The total score ranges from 36 to 180 points, with higher scores indicating stronger learning motivation.
Critical Thinking Disposition Scale — The experimental group and the control group will Baseline (prior to intervention), immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention This scale consists of 20 items and adopts a 6-point Likert scoring method: 1 (Never), 2 (Almost Never), 3 (Rarely), 4 (Sometimes), 5 (Often), and 6 (Always). It measures critical thinking disposition, which refers to an individual's tendency to engage in systematic analysis, maintain an open-minded attitude with empathy, and possess a wise curiosity for questioning, integration, and reflection, all of which facilitate critical thinking processes.
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
China Medical University
Taichung
Taiwan
More China Medical University Hospital trials in Taiwan
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.
