Feeding jejunostomy placementFeeding jejunostomy placement at esophagectomy
Feeding jejunostomy placement: Placement of feeding jejunostomy at staging laparoscopy
Feeding jejunostomy placement at esophagectomy: Placement of feeding jejunostomy at esophagectomy
Study summary
Participants were diagnosed with esophageal cancer needing chemo- or radiochemotherapy before the potentially curing surgery consisting of esophagectomy. At the time of diagnosis, in all participants, a laparoscopy to complete staging was performed. In some patients, a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) was placed at the time of staging laparoscopy; in others, the FJT was placed at the time of esophagectomy. A common risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality is sarcopenia, a condition associated with low skeletal muscle. This study aims to determine whether the timing of the FJT placement affects the progress of sarcopenia.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult patients aged 18 years and above at the time of diagnosis.
* Advanced-stage esophageal cancer or cancer of the esophageal junction and treated with curative intent, including neoadjuvant treatment.
* Patients who received an FJT either before neoadjuvant treatment or during definitive surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Insufficient data for analysis
* Written rejection of general consent
Primary outcome measure(s)
Quantification of the effect of timing of FJT placement on sarcopenia in patients with advanced stages of esophageal cancer in curative cancer treatment. — For each patient the investigated period is under one year. It starts with the time of diagnosis until approximately 6 months after esophagectomy. This will be measured by the skeletal muscle index (SMI) at three points: the first SMI is measured at the time of diagnosis, the second preoperatively at re-staging after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, and the third measurement is six months postoperatively.
We expect that regular enteral feed through FJT during neoadjuvant therapy leads to higher SMI or less progress of sarcopenia compared to FJT placement at esophagectomy.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.