Learner-Centered Debriefing: Two 2-hour simulation sessions followed by a learner-centered debriefing conducted by a trained facilitator. This style emphasizes guided reflection and co-construction of knowledge.
Instructor-Centered Debriefing: Two 2-hour simulation sessions followed by an instructor-centered debriefing conducted by a trained facilitator. This style is the standard practice at the institution and focuses on direct feedback and information transfer from the instructor.
Study summary
Simulation is a cornerstone of health sciences education, with debriefing being its most critical component for fostering clinical skills. While various debriefing styles exist, there is limited evidence comparing the effectiveness of instructor-centered (ICT) versus learner-centered (LCT) approaches, specifically on the development of clinical judgment in nursing students.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
-Students enrolled in the Basic Simulation Labs 2 (LBS2) course as part of their program.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Students who cannot participate in all phases of the study.
* Students who do not provide informed consent.
* Students who are repeating the course.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Change in Clinical Judgment Assessed by the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) — Assessed at two time points: at Baseline (measurement taken during the first-term practical exam, prior to the intervention) and Post-Intervention (measurement taken during the final practical exam, approximately 3 months after the baseline assessment). Assessment is performed using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), a validated 11-item tool. During a standardized practical exam (OSCE), trained evaluators will use novel structured checklists developed by the investigators for this study. A unique checklist has been specifically tailored for each OSCE scenario, designed to operationalize the LCJR by mapping observable student behaviors directly to its scoring criteria. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (1=beginning to 4=exemplary), yielding a total score from 11 to 44. A higher score indicates a more developed level of clinical judgment. For statistical analysis, the raw score will be transformed to a 0-10 scale.
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
International University of Catalonia
Sant Cugat del Vallès
Barcelona
Recruiting
More Universitat Internacional de Catalunya trials in Spain
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.