Trehalose vs Glycine Air-Polishing in Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Trehalose Powder Air-Polishing: Air-polishing procedure using trehalose-based powder (particle size \<65 µm, low abrasiveness) applied supra- and subgingivally with a professional air-polishing device in patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. The intervention is combined with non-surgical debridement using manual curettes and ultrasonic scalers. The procedure is performed at baseline (T0), and repeated at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Clinical outcomes assessed include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS). Implant surfaces are also evaluated in vitro using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess any surface alterations after powder application.

Glycine Powder Air-Polishing: Air-polishing procedure using glycine-based powder (particle size \~25 µm, amino acid composition) applied supra- and subgingivally with a professional air-polishing device in patients with peri-implant mucositis. This treatment is combined with standard non-surgical supportive peri-implant therapy involving manual and ultrasonic debridement. The procedure is performed at baseline (T0), and repeated at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). The intervention aims to reduce plaque accumulation and inflammation. Clinical parameters recorded include PI, BoP, PPD, and BS. Implant surfaces are also assessed in vitro via SEM to compare the effects of glycine versus trehalose on implant surface integrity.

Study summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of trehalose powder compared to glycine powder when used in air-polishing during supportive therapy for peri-implant mucositis, a reversible inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues around dental implants.

A total of 40 adult patients with peri-implant mucositis will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive non-surgical periodontal therapy combined with air-polishing using either trehalose powder (test group) or glycine powder (control group). Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. These include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS), in order to assess plaque accumulation, inflammation, and bleeding.

The primary objective is to compare the reduction in plaque levels between the two groups over the study period. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of changes in gingival inflammation and probing depths, as well as assessment of implant surface integrity through in vitro scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after treatment.

The aim of the study is to determine whether trehalose powder offers improved clinical outcomes and greater implant surface preservation compared to glycine powder in the non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Change in plaque accumulation assessed by Plaque Index (PI) — Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3)
  The Plaque Index (PI) will be used to assess the amount of bacterial plaque on peri-implant surfaces in patients with peri-implant mucositis. The PI will be recorded on four surfaces per implant (mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal/lingual) following application of a plaque disclosing agent. Scores will be assigned according to a standardized ordinal scale: score 0 indicates no plaque; score 1 corresponds to a thin film of plaque detectable only with a disclosing agent or upon probing; score 2 indicates a moderate accumulation of soft deposits visible to the naked eye; and score 3 reflects abundant plaque deposits on the gingival margin and adjacent implant surfaces. The PI for each implant will be calculated as the mean of the four site-specific scores. The primary endpoint is the difference in mean PI scores between the trehalose and glycine groups across all timepoints. Outcome assessors will be calibrated and blinded to group allocation.

Trial sites (1)

More University of Pavia trials in Italy

Other trials for the same condition