Biofeedback as an Adjunctive Treatment for Post-stroke Dysphagia

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Biofeedback: Each participant will attend 5 sessions per week for a total duration of 4 weeks. The duration of each session will take 1 hour, including bio-feedback preparation. At the beginning of the bio-feedback session, two surface electrodes will be applied to the mylohyoid muscle. The patient will be required to swallow at a given time, with food bolus if possible, and perform maneuvers that favour swallowing strength and efficacy: effortful swallow, specific task for timing and coordination, Masako maneuver. The experimental group will perform this training for 45 minutes, plus they will receive a verbal feedback from the speech and language therapist in relation to the efficacy of the performance.

Conventional: Each participant will attend 5 sessions per week for a total duration of 4 weeks. The patient will be required to swallow at a given time, with food bolus if possible, and perform maneuvers that favour swallowing strength and efficacy: effortful swallow, specific task for timing and coordination, Masako maneuver. The control group will perform this training for 45 minutes, with a verbal feedback from the speech and language therapist in relation to the efficacy of the performance.

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the effect of biofeedback treatment is more effective than a control treatment in the recovery of dysphagia.

This study will be a multicentric randomized, single-blind controlled study. The investigators intend to recruit 100 patients who have suffered a stroke and have dysphagia. Fifty patients will undergo training with bio-feedback (experimental group) and the other fifty patients will undergo standard training, using only verbal feedback rather than visual feedback (control group). Our hypothesis, based on the results obtained in some previous studies, is that in the control group the efficacy of the treatment will be lower in the absence of immediate visual feedback of strength, timing, coordination and efficacy of the swallowing act.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Positive changes of efficacy of swallowing — The evaluation of swallowing functions will be done before treatment, then up to 4 weeks (after 20 treatment sessions) finally up to two months
  Efficacy of swallowing is defined as patient's ability to start a functional swallowing reflex and to manage deglutition of saliva, then small bolus in ever greater quantities until getting to a full meal in safety. It will be measured by FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale- minimum value is the worst: 1; maximum value:7
• Changes in penetration/aspiration of saliva or bolus — The evaluation of swallowing the entity of penetration/aspiration will be done before treatment, then up to 4 weeks (after 20 treatment sessions) finally up to two months]
  Penetration is a generic term refering to the action of material penetrating the larynx and entering the airway and remains above the true vocal folds, while aspiration Aspiration is a generic term refering to the action of material penetrating the larynx and entering the airway below the true vocal folds. The presence, entity and gravity of that parameters will be measured by Penetration Aspiration Scale during fibroscopy. The minimum value is 1, and indicates the better performance; the maximum value is 8, that is the worst.
• Changes in pharyngeal residues — The evaluation of swallowing the entity of pharyngeal residue will be done before treatment, then up to 4 weeks (after 20 treatment sessions) finally up to two months
  They consist in presence of bolus or saliva post deglutition in the pharyngeal zone. The presence and entity/severity of these parameters will be assessed by Yale Scale during fibroscopy. The minimum value is 1, that means only coating, while 5 is the maximum level that means abundant residues.

Trial sites (1)

More IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy trials in Italy

Other trials for the same condition