Motivational Interview Group (MIG)Conventional treatment group (CTG)
Motivational Interview Group (MIG): Brief MI intervention with the conventional treatment
Conventional treatment group (CTG): Conventional treatment
Study summary
The best way for dental professionals act using dialogue methods and individual approaches in daily clinical practice to change behavioral is still inconclusive. Thus, the objective will be evaluate the effect of using motivational interviewing as part of the treatment of periodontitis in order to increase the adherence of adults to adequate oral health behavior.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adults, over 18-year-old;
* BoP (Bleeding on probing) in at least 30% of sites;
* Diagnosed periodontitis.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Smoking;
* Diabetes;
* Pregnancy (or the planning of pregnancy);
* Immunosuppressive illness or a medication, hepatitis, HIV, a bleeding illness or a anticoagulant;
* A need for the antibiotic prophylaxis;
* Hyposalivation or use of medications that cause hyposalivation
Primary outcome measure(s)
The change in Bleeding on Probing to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior — baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year BoP - Dichotomic response after probing the gingival sulcus. High values mean worst condition.
The change in Plaque Index to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior — baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year PI - Each of the 6 sites of the tooth is given a score from 0 to 3. High values mean worst condition.
The change in Gingival index to evaluate the improvement in hygiene behavior — baseline, 15 days after supragingival treatment, 30 and 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year GI - Each of the 6 sites of the tooth is given a score from 0 to 3. High values mean worst condition.
Patient satisfaction assessed by the change in Quality of Life questionnaire — baseline, 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year Quality of life - % of patients with better scores (lowest values) of quality of life. It can vary from 0 to 56.
Patient perception assessed by the change in autoperception of oral health questionnaire — baseline, 60 days after subgingival treatment and through study completion, an average of 1 year Autoperception of oral health - rate of patients with better condition of oral health perception. The answer options are: Great; Good; Regular; Bad; Terrible. 0-4 (lower scores mean better self-perception).
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Carlos Heitor Moreira
Santa Maria
Rio Grande do Sul
More Universidade Federal de Santa Maria trials in Brazil
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.