Low Level Laser Therapy: Low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device and the following treatment parameters: a wavelength of 830 nm, an output power of 50 mW, continuous mode, and an energy density of 4 J/cm².
All participants will also receive a metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint for 4 weeks.
Sham Low Level Laser Therapy: Sham low-level laser therapy will be administered three times per week for 4 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions, using a BTL-4000 Smart laser therapy device that will remain switched off throughout each session. To maintain participant blinding, participants in both groups will wear headphones and an eye mask during each treatment session.
All participants will also receive a metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint for 4 weeks.
Study summary
Trigger finger, also known as stenosing tenosynovitis, is one of the most common disorders affecting the hand. Its lifetime prevalence is 2-3%. Patients typically present with locking of the affected finger during flexion and painful catching during extension. In mild cases, pain, swelling, and morning stiffness may be present without triggering. In more severe cases, the affected finger may become locked in flexion.
Conservative treatment methods, corticosteroid injections, and surgical interventions can be used in the treatment of trigger finger. Conservative treatment options include activity modification, splint immobilization, exercise programs, massage, physical therapy modalities including extracorporeal shock wave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Splinting is an inexpensive and effective treatment option for trigger finger.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a treatment modality based on photobiomodulation, which leads to biological changes in living organisms through the interaction of photons with atoms or molecules. LLLT is used to promote wound healing and tissue repair, prevent tissue damage, reduce inflammation and edema, and provide analgesia. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of various musculoskeletal disorders.
This study aims to investigate the effects of adding active LLLT to splint treatment in patients with trigger finger. Patients receiving active LLLT plus splint treatment will be compared with those receiving sham LLLT plus splint treatment in terms of clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Applying to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University
* A clinical diagnosis of trigger finger based on typical pain and tenderness over the A1 pulley accompanied by triggering of the affected finger
* Willingness to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
* Multiple trigger fingers in the same hand
* Fixed deformity (Quinnell grade 4)
* Splint treatment, physical therapy, or steroid injection for the affected trigger finger within the previous 6 months
* Previous surgery for the affected trigger finger
* Musculoskeletal disorders or peripheral nerve injury involving the ipsilateral upper extremity
* Rheumatoid arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren disease, amyloidosis, or mucopolysaccharidosis
* Active infection, bleeding, skin lesions, or an implant at the treatment site
* Radiotherapy within the previous 6 months
* Photodermatosis, photosensitivity, or systemic lupus erythematosus
* Pregnancy, epilepsy, coagulopathy, active malignancy, or the presence of a cardiac pacemaker
* Cognitive impairment that precludes understanding of the study questionnaires.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Visual Analog Scale — All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. Changes in trigger finger pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Scores range from 0 to 10 cm, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Quinnell Classification — All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. The severity of triggering will be assessed using the Quinnell Classification: Grade 0, normal movement of the digit; Grade 1, uneven movement; Grade 2, actively correctable locking of the digit; Grade 3, passively correctable locking; and Grade 4, fixed deformity. Higher grades indicate greater triggering severity.
Trigger Finger Assessment Scale — All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. The Trigger Finger Assessment Scale consists of three separate 0-to-10-point scales that assess the frequency, severity, and functional impact of triggering. Higher scores on each scale indicate more frequent or severe triggering or greater functional impact.
Scale reference: Tarbhai K, Hannah S, von Schroeder HP. Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(2):243-249.
Number of Triggering Events During 10 Active Full Fist Movements — All participants will be assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after completion of treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. The number of triggering events during 10 consecutive active full fist movements will be recorded (0-10).
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.