Gamified-Combined Cognitive Bias Modification: A gamified version of the combined cognitive bias modification (CBM-C) intervention, which includes both attention and interpretation bias modification tasks. The attention component is a modified dot-probe task, and the interpretation component consists of OCD-related scenarios with word-completion exercises. Gamification elements such as feedback and visual rewards are embedded to enhance motivation and engagement. The presentation order of the two intervention components will be counterbalanced: half of the participants will receive the attention bias task first followed by the interpretation task; the other half will receive the interpretation task first followed by the attention bias task. The intervention is delivered via mobile phone in eight sessions over four weeks (two sessions per week).
Standard Combined Cognitive Bias Modification: A standard version of the combined cognitive bias modification (CBM-C) intervention, consisting of attention and interpretation bias tasks without gamification features. The attention task is a modified dot-probe paradigm, and the interpretation task involves OCD-related scenarios followed by word-completion exercises. The presentation order of the two intervention components will be counterbalanced: half of the participants will receive the attention bias task first followed by the interpretation task; the other half will receive the interpretation task first followed by the attention bias task. The intervention is delivered via mobile phone in eight sessions over four weeks (two sessions per week).
Placebo: A placebo version of the standard CBM-C intervention that retains the same structure and timing but omits all active bias modification elements. The attention task (modified dot-probe) presents probes equally behind threat and neutral stimuli, and the interpretation task includes OCD-related scenarios with word-completion items that lead to neutral outcomes. No manipulations are applied to shift cognitive bias. The presentation order of the two intervention components will be counterbalanced: half of the participants will receive the attention bias task first followed by the interpretation task; the other half will receive the interpretation task first followed by the attention bias task. The intervention is delivered via mobile phone in eight sessions over four weeks (two sessions per week).
Study summary
This randomized controlled trial examines the effects of a mobile-based gamified combined cognitive bias modification (CBM-C) intervention on obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsessive beliefs, attentional and interpretation biases, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress. The gamified CBM-C condition is compared to a standard mobile-based CBM-C and a placebo control condition. All interventions are delivered via a mobile application. Assessments are conducted at baseline, post-intervention (week 4), and 3-month follow-up.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age 18 years or older
* Primary diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), confirmed by a licensed clinician using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5)
* No current suicidal ideation or psychotic symptoms
* Access to the internet and a mobile phone
* Stable psychiatric medication use for at least one month prior to enrollment, with no changes in dosage during the 4-week intervention period
* No current neurological or medical condition that would interfere with participation
* Ability to perceive colored visual stimuli (e.g., no color blindness)
* Not currently enrolled in another intervention-based study
* Not receiving any other form of psychological treatment at the time of participation
Exclusion Criteria:
* Presence of active suicidal ideation or psychotic symptoms
* Unstable psychiatric medication use (e.g., recent dose change within the past month or expected change during the intervention period)
* Significant neurological or medical illness that may interfere with participation
* Visual impairments that would prevent accurate perception of colored stimuli (e.g., color blindness)
* Current participation in another clinical trial involving psychological intervention
* Receiving concurrent psychotherapy or other psychological treatments outside of the study
Primary outcome measure(s)
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale — Baseline, Post-Intervention (Week 4), 3-Month Follow-Up This clinician-administered measure is used to assess the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. It includes 19 items in total; however, only the first 10 items are used to calculate the total score. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale, resulting in a total score range of 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (worse outcome).The measure is conducted through a semi-structured clinical interview.
Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 — Baseline, Post-Intervention (Week 4), 3-Month Follow-Up This self-report measure is used to assess dysfunctional beliefs commonly associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms. It consists of 44 items rated on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7. The total score ranges from 44 to 308. Higher scores indicate that the individual has more maladaptive obsessive-compulsive beliefs (worse outcome).
OC bias index — Baseline, Post-Intervention (Week 4), 3-Month Follow-Up Measure of interpretation biases. It is a computerized task that requires participants to read and imagine themselves in 10 OC-relevant test scenarios and 10 non-OC-relevant scenarios with a title and missing letter in the final word of the sentence. Participants are then provided with a recognition rating form where they see the title of only the 10 OC-relevant scenarios in which they had previously imagined themselves. Each title corresponds with four different interpretations: target bias (OC-positive and OC-negative), and foil bias (foil-positive and foil-negative). Participants are asked to rate (on a 4-point scale) each sentence independently in terms of how similar each interpretation option is to the meaning of the scenario they had previously read. Target and Foil Bias Index scores are calculated by subtracting ratings for negative items from ratings for positive items. A positive score indicates that the individual has more OC-positive interpretations (better outcome).
Dot-Probe Task with Eye-Tracking — Baseline, Post-Intervention (Week 4), 3-Month Follow-Up A computerized task measuring attention bias using 48 trials combining probe type, position, and image type (neutral vs. OCD-related). Each trial includes a fixation cross (500 ms), a picture pair (1500 ms), and a directional probe replacing one image. Participants respond via keyboard; bias scores are calculated by subtracting response times for probes replacing OCD-related vs. neutral images. More negative bias scores indicate reduced attention to OCD-related stimuli (better outcome). Eye-tracking (Gazepoint HD 150Hz) measures (a) vigilance: first fixation latency and frequency (including direction bias), (b) disengagement: first fixation duration, and (c) sustained attention: total fixation count and duration. Post-assessment reductions in early, frequent, or prolonged fixations on OCD-related stimuli compared to baseline are interpreted as improved attentional control (better outcome).
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.