Ireland
--:--IST
Active, not recruiting Not applicable

Sleeved vs. Sleeveless Guides for Immediate Implant Placement

NCT07845890 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Egypt tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2026-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-29

Condition(s) studied

Tooth LossMaxillary Premolar AreaImmediate Dental Implant PlacementGuided Implant PlacementSleeved Static Surgical GuidesSleeveless Surgical GuideBone GraftingProvisional CrownCustomized Healing Abutment

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Conventional Sleeved Static Surgical GuideSleeveless Static Surgical Guide

Conventional Sleeved Static Surgical Guide: Immediate implant placement in the maxillary premolar region using a conventional sleeved static surgical guide, with silicate-added β-tricalcium phosphate grafting of the peri-implant gap and placement of a provisional crown.

Sleeveless Static Surgical Guide: Immediate implant placement in the maxillary premolar region using a sleeveless static surgical guide, with silicate-added β-tricalcium phosphate grafting of the peri-implant gap and placement of a provisional crown.

Study summary

This study aims to compare implant placement accuracy using sleeved versus sleeveless static surgical guides for immediate implant placement in the premolar region.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with non-restorable teeth in premolar area requiring dental extraction. * Age range: from18 to 50 years. * Adequate inter-arch relation and inter-occlusal space to accommodate the prosthetic restoration. * Jumping gap more than 2mm. * Patients with good oral hygiene. * Patients willing to participate in the study's follow-up intervals. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with any pathological lesion or aggressive periodontal disease at the planned surgical site impaired the immediate implant placement. * Alcohol or drug abuse. * Smokers. * Patients with systemic diseases that absolutely contraindicate implant placement (bleeding disorders, immunosuppression,…etc.) * Pregnancy. * Patients with para-functional habits (bruxism and clenching). * Lack of motivation or inability to maintain good oral hygiene.

Primary outcome measure(s)

  • Global Coronal Deviation — Immediately after implant placement.
    The deviation between the planned and actual implant positions at the coronal point will be assessed using CBCT superimposition, measured in mm.
  • Global Apical Deviation — Immediately after implant placement.
    The deviation between the planned and actual implant positions at the apical point will be assessed using CBCT superimposition, measured in mm.
  • Angular Deviation — Immediately after implant placement.
    The angular deviation between the planned and actual implant axes will be assessed using CBCT superimposition, measured in degrees (°).
  • Vertical (Depth) Deviation — Immediately after implant placement.
    The deviation in implant depth between the planned and actual implant positions will be assessed using CBCT superimposition, measured in mm.

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University Al Mansurah Dakahlia Governorate
Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07845890 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt