The Effect of Post-Scenario Debriefing and Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Anaphylactic Shock Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Performance, Self-Confidence, and Satisfaction

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

rapid cycle deliberate practice: Unlike traditional debriefing, feedback is provided by pausing the scenario within the simulation. Then the part of the script up to the pause point is repeated.

Post-scenario debriefing: Debriefing is performed at the end of the simulation scenario.

Study summary

This study aims to examine the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) on nursing students' knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction levels regarding anaphylactic shock management. Based on a randomized controlled study design, the study will compare third-year nursing students in terms of RCDP application with traditional analysis methods performed at the end of a scenario. Students, divided into intervention and control groups, will have their knowledge levels, simulation performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction assessed using various scales. The retention of learning and students' subjective learning experiences will also be included in the research. The outcome of this study will determine whether RCDP is an effective method for improving critical clinical decision-making and emergency management skills in nursing students.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Nursing students' knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock: Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock — before the intervention, on the day of the intervention, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
  Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock The 'Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock,' developed by researchers in line with the literature (Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Karadakovan \& Eti Aslan, 2017; Eti Aslan, 2017; Nair \& Peate, 2018), will be administered as follows: a 'Pre-Test' before the training to determine the students' current knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock; a 'Post-Test' immediately following the simulation application after the training; and a '1st Retention Test' 8 weeks later to measure the retention of learning. The Knowledge Test consists of 25 multiple-choice questions with 5 options each, focusing on knowledge levels regarding shock and anaphylactic shock. This form has been finalized with necessary adjustments based on expert opinions. The maximum score on this test is 100 points, and the minimum is 0 points. A higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge.
• Simulation Performance Checklist: Nursing Students' Performance Level Regarding Anaphylactic Shock — on the same day as the intervention and 8 weeks after the intervention
  Simulation Performance Checklist The 'Simulation Performance Checklist for Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock', created by researchers in line with the literature (Casale et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Dreborg and Him, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Eti Aslan, 2017; Karadakovan, 2017), will be used to determine students' performance levels. A 'Post-Test' will be administered immediately after the simulation application, and a '1st Retention Test' will be administered after 8 weeks to measure the retention of learning. The checklist consists of 10 items, and each item is scored as "0 = Could not/Did not apply/No", "1 = Did/Applied/Yes". A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 can be obtained from the checklist. This form has been finalized after necessary adjustments were made in line with expert opinions.

Trial sites (1)

More Baskent University trials in Turkey

Other trials for the same condition