CPAP vs MAD for OSA in Patients With Cognitive Impairment. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

MAD: Mandibular Advancement Device. It is a custom-fitted oral appliance used primarily to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and snoring. The device works by gently advancing the lower jaw (mandible) forward, which helps keep the airway open during sleep by preventing the tongue and soft tissues from collapsing and blocking the airway. MADs are a non-invasive alternative to CPAP therapy and are especially suitable for patients with mild to moderate OSA or those who are intolerant to CPAP

CPAP: CPAP stands for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. It is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A CPAP machine delivers a constant stream of air through a mask worn over the nose or nose and mouth during sleep. This air pressure keeps the airway open, preventing pauses in breathing caused by airway collapse. CPAP is highly effective, especially for moderate to severe OSA, but some patients may find it uncomfortable or difficult to tolerate.

Study summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the sleep health and overall well-being of millions of adults worldwide. It is characterized by breathing difficulties during sleep caused by an obstructed upper airway, leading to fragmented sleep, oxygen deprivation, and increased sympathetic activity. OSA and its associated health problems contribute to an annual economic burden exceeding $150 billion in the United States. Studies have shown that individuals with OSA are 26% more likely to develop cognitive impairment compared to those without the condition. However, despite the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, many patients struggle with acceptance and adherence to this treatment. As an alternative, mandibular advancement devices (MADs) have gained acceptance among OSA patients by improving upper airway anatomy through repositioning of the jaw and tongue, thus reducing collapsibility. This non-invasive approach shows promise, particularly in addressing the unique craniofacial features commonly found in East Asian OSA patients.

To further investigate the efficacy of MAD versus CPAP therapy, a multi-center, randomized clinical trial is proposed. The trial aims to evaluate cognitive function using established assessment tools and explore the relationship between different Asian ethnicities and changes in cognitive function, ambulatory blood pressure, and cerebral oxygen saturation. Additionally, brain MRI will be utilized to examine whether baseline brain structure and function can predict treatment response in OSA patients. Participants diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA will be randomly assigned to either the MAD or CPAP group in a 1:1 ratio. Baseline assessments, along with six-month and one-year follow-ups, will be conducted to assess the impact of the interventions. This trial seeks to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of MAD versus CPAP therapy in Asian populations, specifically focusing on their effects on cognitive function and other relevant outcomes in individuals with OSA.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) — Baseline, 6 months (primary endpoint), and 12 months
  A score for cognitive function

Trial sites (1)

More National University Hospital, Singapore trials in Singapore

Other trials for the same condition